- From: Takeshi Yoshino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 04:06:59 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2015 11:07:52 UTC
>> stream@[[sourceSupportsByob]] > Maybe we should not allow ReadableByteStreams that don't support BYOB? It would help uncomplicate things, and would prevent the situation of giving a "false contract" where you support getByobReader() but actually it is just an inefficient shim over the normal reader. I guess you meant s/ReadableByteStream/building ReadableByteStream with an underlying source that doesn't support BYOB/. Maybe you're right. I'll try it out. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/353#issuecomment-105872043
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2015 11:07:52 UTC