- From: karolklp <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 04:17:04 -0700
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/705@github.com>
OK, guys - we need to settle, what's the proper name of SW Is it: 1) Service Workers 2) ServiceWorkers 3) Service Worker 4) ServiceWorker Various examples of usage from the web :) 1) Service Workers @jeffposnick - http://updates.html5rocks.com/2015/02/offline-first-with-sw-precache 2) ServiceWorkers @jakearchibald - http://jakearchibald.com/2014/using-serviceworker-today/ 3) Service Worker https://notifications.spec.whatwg.org/#service-worker-api 4) ServiceWorker https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/ServiceWorker_API (in title, in text it's 'service worker' so technically it's the fifth one) Combos: @slightlyoff - Name of this repo is "ServiceWorker", at the end of the URL https://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker/ is "service_worker" and in title h1 there's Service Workers Some problems that this small issue introduces: - SW is now included in Platinum Elements in Polymer. Let's see what tags are there: "serviceworker" and "service-worker". On Stack Overflow? [service-worker] - It'd be nice to measure people interest in this topic after ex. Google I/O - but what phrase should we use? Additionaly, it actually means something ([The service workers strike](http://ubyssey.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/wpid-20121004_kai-jacobson-2.jpg)), so we should be extra-careful. It's the last moment, when we still can control it somehow (until hundreds of blogs will write some article about SW, using different names) - so let's do it :) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/705
Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 11:17:31 UTC