public-w3process@w3.org from March 2015 by date

Tuesday, 31 March 2015

• Close of Initial Review Period, W3C Process2015 Stephen Zilles
• RE: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 31 March 2015 Stephen Zilles
• Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 31 March 2015 Jeff Jaffe

Monday, 30 March 2015

• Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 31 March 2015 Stephen Zilles

Thursday, 26 March 2015

• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Janina Sajka
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Shane McCarron
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs David Singer
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Janina Sajka
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Shane McCarron
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Steve Faulkner
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Steve Faulkner
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Shane McCarron
• RE: warnings on outdated specs/docs Stephen Zilles
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Janina Sajka

Wednesday, 25 March 2015

• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Delfí Ramírez
• RE: warnings on outdated specs/docs Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs David Singer
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Steve Faulkner
• RE: warnings on outdated specs/docs Stephen Zilles
• RE: warnings on outdated specs/docs Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Janina Sajka
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs David Singer
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Steve Faulkner
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Janina Sajka
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Steve Faulkner
• Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs Birkir Gunnarsson
• warnings on outdated specs/docs Steve Faulkner

Tuesday, 24 March 2015

• Re: Proposed wording comment 9 appeal -> Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. David Singer
• Re: Proposed wording comment 9 appeal -> Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Wayne Carr
• RE: Proposed wording comment 9 appeal -> Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Stephen Zilles

Monday, 23 March 2015

• Regrets Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 24 March 2015 chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 24 March 2015 Wayne Carr
• Re: Proposed wording comment 9 appeal -> Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Wayne Carr
• Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 24 March 2015 Jeff Jaffe
• Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 24 March 2015 Stephen Zilles
• RE: Proposed wording comment 9 appeal -> Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Stephen Zilles

Saturday, 21 March 2015

• Re: Proposed wording comment 9 appeal -> Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. chaals@yandex-team.ru

Friday, 20 March 2015

• Proposed wording comment 9 appeal -> Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Wayne Carr
• Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Olle Olsson
• Re: Call for Review, W3C Process2015 chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. chaals@yandex-team.ru

Thursday, 19 March 2015

• Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. David Singer
• Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Wayne Carr
• Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Jeff Jaffe
• Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Wayne Carr
• Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. David Singer
• Re: dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. L. David Baron
• dropping the request -> Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Wayne Carr
• Re: adding appeal already approved for unfinished specs to the list in the Process David Singer
• adding appeal already approved for unfinished specs to the list in the Process Wayne Carr
• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Wayne Carr

Wednesday, 18 March 2015

• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. David Singer
• wording for AC appeals proposal - related to Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" Wayne Carr
• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Wayne Carr
• RE: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Wayne Carr
• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. David Singer
• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Wayne Carr
• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Wayne Carr
• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. chaals@yandex-team.ru
• RE: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. David Singer
• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Jeff Jaffe

Tuesday, 17 March 2015

• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. David Singer
• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Wayne Carr
• Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Re: Review comments on 3 March 2015 Process Editor's draft Wayne Carr
• Re: Review comments on 3 March 2015 Process Editor's draft David Singer
• Re: Review comments on 3 March 2015 Process Editor's draft Wayne Carr
• w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
• RE: Review comments on 3 March 2015 Process Editor's draft Stephen Zilles
• Process2015 feedback Nottingham, Mark

Monday, 16 March 2015

• Re: Review comments on 3 March 2015 Process Editor's draft Wayne Carr
• Re: Review comments on 3 March 2015 Process Editor's draft David Singer
• Re: Review comments on 3 March 2015 Process Editor's draft Wayne Carr
• Re: Review comments on 3 March 2015 Process Editor's draft David Singer
• Re: Review comments on 3 March 2015 Process Editor's draft Wayne Carr
• Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 17 March 2015 chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 17 March 2015 Stephen Zilles
• RE: Review comments on 3 March 2015 Process Editor's draft Stephen Zilles

Thursday, 12 March 2015

• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup David Singer
• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup Wayne Carr

Wednesday, 11 March 2015

• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup Wayne Carr
• Re: When to close a Working Group? David Singer
• Re: When to close a Working Group? Wayne Carr
• Re: When to close a Working Group? David Singer
• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup David Singer
• Re: When to close a Working Group? Wayne Carr
• Re: When to close a Working Group? Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
• Re: When to close a Working Group? Jeff Jaffe
• Re: When to close a Working Group? David Singer

Tuesday, 10 March 2015

• RE: When to close a Working Group? Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
• RE: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup Stephen Zilles
• When to close a Working Group? Harry Halpin
• RE: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup L. David Baron
• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup Peter Linss
• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup David Singer
• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup David Singer
• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup David Singer
• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup Linss, Peter
• Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 10 March 2015 David Singer
• Re: ISSUE-100 - going to PR with open exclusions David Singer
• Re: can we close ISSUE-97 (name of AB) David Singer
• Re: ISSUE-100 - going to PR with open exclusions Arthur Barstow
• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup Arthur Barstow
• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup Peter Linss
• Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup L. David Baron
• ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup chaals@yandex-team.ru
• ISSUE-100 - going to PR with open exclusions chaals@yandex-team.ru
• can we close ISSUE-97 (name of AB) chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 10 March 2015 chaals@yandex-team.ru
• Agenda Process Document Task Force 10 March 2015 Stephen Zilles

Saturday, 7 March 2015

• Re: New Process Draft... - diff without must, should ... Wayne Carr
• Review comments on 3 March 2015 Process Editor's draft Wayne Carr

Friday, 6 March 2015

• Re: New Process Draft... Wayne Carr
• Re: New Process Draft... David Singer
• Call for Review, W3C Process2015 Jeff Jaffe
• Re: New Process Draft... Ralph Swick

Thursday, 5 March 2015

• Re: New Process Draft... David Singer
• Re: New Process Draft... Jeff Jaffe
• Re: New Process Draft... David Singer

Wednesday, 4 March 2015

• New Process Draft... chaals@yandex-team.ru

Tuesday, 3 March 2015

• 2nd Draft Announcement of Process2015 Wide Review Stephen Zilles
• [Issue-152] 2nd draft Note for Draft Process Document Stephen Zilles
• Re: [Issue-152] Note for Draft Process Document Wayne Carr
• RE: [Issue-152] Note for Draft Process Document Stephen Zilles

Monday, 2 March 2015

• Re: [Issue-152] Note for Draft Process Document Wayne Carr
• Agenda Process Document Task Force 3 March 2015 Stephen Zilles
• Draft Announcement of Process2015 Wide Review Stephen Zilles
• Re: [Issue-152] Note for Draft Process Document David Singer
• Re: [Issue-152] Note for Draft Process Document Wayne Carr
• RE: [Issue-152] Note for Draft Process Document Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
• Re: [Issue-152] Note for Draft Process Document David Singer
• RE: [Issue-152] Note for Draft Process Document Stephen Zilles
• Re: [Issue-152] Note for Draft Process Document David Singer
• RE: [Issue-152] Note for Draft Process Document Stephen Zilles

Sunday, 1 March 2015

• Re: [Issue-152] Note for Draft Process Document Wayne Carr

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2015 17:04:10 UTC