- From: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:53:02 -0700
- To: chaals@yandex-team.ru, Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2015 22:53:31 UTC
+1 On 2015-03-17 15:36, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote: > + wayne.carr@ > - sysbot+tracker@ > > I propose changing the second sentence of section 8.2 from > "When Advisory Committee review immediately precedes a decision, Advisory Committee representatives may only appeal when there is dissent." > > to > "When there is dissent in an Advisory Committee review, or the director reaches a decision other than that proposed (including simply not doing what was proposed), Advisory Committee representatives may appeal the decision." > > Note that this discussion also touches on issue-7 although I don't have a proposal to address that further at the moment. > > cheers > > Chaals > > 17.03.2015, 17:58, "Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>: >> w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review. >> >> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/actions/47 >> >> Assigned to: Charles McCathie Nevile > -- > Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex > chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2015 22:53:31 UTC