Re: w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review.

On 3/17/2015 6:36 PM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:
> + wayne.carr@
> - sysbot+tracker@
>
> I propose changing the second sentence of section 8.2 from
> "When Advisory Committee review immediately precedes a decision, Advisory Committee representatives may only appeal when there is dissent."
>
> to
> "When there is dissent in an Advisory Committee review, or the director reaches a decision other than that proposed (including simply not doing what was proposed), Advisory Committee representatives may appeal the decision."

I think I understand the theory by which some would like to have more of 
the Director's decisions available for appeal.

But before I (or someone else) takes this proposal to the Director, it 
would be useful to provide some actual use cases.

For example, if a WG proposed a transition and it was rejected by the 
Director, and the WG felt so wronged that they wanted to appeal this 
rejection, that would be a sample use case.  Can someone give several 
examples where that happened in the last five years?


>
> Note that this discussion also touches on issue-7 although I don't have a proposal to address that further at the moment.
>
> cheers
>
> Chaals
>
> 17.03.2015, 17:58, "Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>:
>> w3process-ACTION-47: Produce a proposal for addressing wayne's "comment 9" - allowing appeal where the director's decision isn't the same as the proposal sent for review.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/actions/47
>>
>> Assigned to: Charles McCathie Nevile
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
>

Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2015 00:20:05 UTC