Re: New Process Draft
RE: Fwd: New Process Draft
Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 28 April 2015
- Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 28 April 2015
- Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 28 April 2015
" W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Thoughts on culture -esp. chairs and versions Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: Thoughts on culture -esp. chairs and versions Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: Thoughts on culture -esp. chairs and versions Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: Thoughts on culture -esp. chairs and versions Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: Thoughts on culture -esp. chairs and versions Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: Thoughts on culture -esp. chairs and versions Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016 -> CG Affiliated with WG
- Re: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
Addendum to Set of approved edits to the Draft Process 2015 docuemtn Reviewed in March 2015
Set of approved edits to the Draft Process 2015 docuemtn Reviewed in March 2015
An update on Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: An update on Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
process.next wish list
Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 14 April 2015
- Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 14 April 2015
- Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 14 April 2015
- Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 14 April 2015
Draft Disposition of Comments on the Process 2015 Review
Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- RE: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- RE: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
Re: warnings on outdated specs/docs
Superseded warning on 2005 Process Document
w3process-ISSUE-161 (Voting Rules in Charter): Sections 3.4 and 6.2.6 have different statements about Voting rules in a Charter [Process Document]
w3process-ISSUE-160 (Dismissal without cause): Director can dismis a AB or TAG participant without giving a cause [Process Document]
Issue-152 ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding Publishing Edited Recommendations
- RE: Issue-152 ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding Publishing Edited Recommendations
- Re: Issue-152 ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding Publishing Edited Recommendations
Issue-159 ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding the definition of "Editorial Change"
w3process-ISSUE-159 (define editorial change): Remove the current circularity in definition of "editorial change" [Process Document]
Summarizing the state of Issue-152
- RE: Summarizing the state of Issue-152
Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 7 April 2015
Comments on: W3C Process2015
- RE: Comments on: W3C Process2015
- Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015
- RE: Comments on: W3C Process2015
- Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- Re: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- Re: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- RE: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- Re: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- RE: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- RE: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- Re: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- RE: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- Re: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- Re: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- RE: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]