- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:53:47 -0400
- To: "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>, W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 15:53:58 UTC
On 4/21/2015 11:40 PM, Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
> Admittedly, lots of these points are more about W3C culture or the
> social norms of standardization than about the Process Document per
> se. Likewise, I don’t think the formal process necessarily must
> change to address these problems, and arguably some proposals should
> be tried as experiments and only applied to the process document if
> they succeed.
Do we need a "W3C culture" CG that finds different means to improve our
effectiveness outside of a focus on the process document? I think it is
great that we have the ProcessCG to focus on the formal process. But if
we push everything through this CG; and our behavior is always to figure
out how to adapt the process document, we might be missing the boat.
A culture CG could:
* Identify best practices
* Assess existing WGs and see where they are failing to implement
these best practices
* Be action oriented - in pushing WGs, their leadership, and the Team
to implement these practices.
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 15:53:58 UTC