- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:53:47 -0400
- To: "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>, W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 15:53:58 UTC
On 4/21/2015 11:40 PM, Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > Admittedly, lots of these points are more about W3C culture or the > social norms of standardization than about the Process Document per > se. Likewise, I don’t think the formal process necessarily must > change to address these problems, and arguably some proposals should > be tried as experiments and only applied to the process document if > they succeed. Do we need a "W3C culture" CG that finds different means to improve our effectiveness outside of a focus on the process document? I think it is great that we have the ProcessCG to focus on the formal process. But if we push everything through this CG; and our behavior is always to figure out how to adapt the process document, we might be missing the boat. A culture CG could: * Identify best practices * Assess existing WGs and see where they are failing to implement these best practices * Be action oriented - in pushing WGs, their leadership, and the Team to implement these practices.
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 15:53:58 UTC