- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:49:39 +0200
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 14/04/15 09:26, David Singer wrote: > The furthest I was willing to go is up to one year. If people cannot live with that, then I suspect we’ll end up having no consensus to change, which is that we’ll continue to require immediate resignation. Possibly. W3C was already quite ridiculous last time when we had to tell a respected expert of the Web he had to resign, his home company being of course quite upset. I don't expect less next time if we're not a bit innovative instead of building pointless and conservative walls. Our (using your "we" here) current reply is to say we don't force resignation immediately but oh well let's say a bit later. Wow. Was worth spending months on it. </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2015 14:50:06 UTC