Thursday, 30 April 2015
- Re: Thoughts on culture -esp. chairs and versions Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: Thoughts on culture -esp. chairs and versions Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: Thoughts on culture -esp. chairs and versions Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: Thoughts on culture -esp. chairs and versions Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: Thoughts on culture -esp. chairs and versions Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
Wednesday, 29 April 2015
- Thoughts on culture -esp. chairs and versions Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- RE: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
Tuesday, 28 April 2015
- Re: Fwd: New Process Draft
- Re: New Process Draft
- Re: Fwd: New Process Draft
- RE: Fwd: New Process Draft
- Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 28 April 2015
- Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 28 April 2015
Monday, 27 April 2015
- Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 28 April 2015
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
Sunday, 26 April 2015
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
Friday, 24 April 2015
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
Thursday, 23 April 2015
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- RE: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Re: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- " W3C Culture" CG? RE: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
Wednesday, 22 April 2015
- Re: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016 -> CG Affiliated with WG
- Re: Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
- Problems I'd like to see addressed in Process 2016
Sunday, 19 April 2015
Friday, 17 April 2015
Thursday, 16 April 2015
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- RE: Superseded warning on 2005 Process Document
- Re: Toward process changes that actually move the Web Forward [Was: Re: An update on Suggested response to ...]
- Toward process changes that actually move the Web Forward [Was: Re: An update on Suggested response to ...]
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: process.next wish list
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Superseded warning on 2005 Process Document
Wednesday, 15 April 2015
- RE: Superseded warning on 2005 Process Document
- Re: Superseded warning on 2005 Process Document
- Re: process.next wish list
- RE: process.next wish list
- Re: An update on Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: process.next wish list
- RE: An update on Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: process.next wish list
- Re: An update on Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: process.next wish list
- Re: An update on Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: process.next wish list
- Re: process.next wish list
- Re: process.next wish list
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
Tuesday, 14 April 2015
- An update on Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- process.next wish list
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- RE: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 14 April 2015
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 14 April 2015
- Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 14 April 2015
Monday, 13 April 2015
- Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 14 April 2015
- Draft Disposition of Comments on the Process 2015 Review
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- RE: Comments on: W3C Process2015
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- RE: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- RE: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
- Re: Suggested response to the Yandex "cannot iive with loosening of TAG participation requiremens"
Sunday, 12 April 2015
Friday, 10 April 2015
Thursday, 9 April 2015
- Re: Superseded warning on 2005 Process Document
- Superseded warning on 2005 Process Document
- w3process-ISSUE-161 (Voting Rules in Charter): Sections 3.4 and 6.2.6 have different statements about Voting rules in a Charter [Process Document]
- w3process-ISSUE-160 (Dismissal without cause): Director can dismis a AB or TAG participant without giving a cause [Process Document]
Tuesday, 7 April 2015
- Re: Issue-159 ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding the definition of "Editorial Change"
- Re: Issue-159 ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding the definition of "Editorial Change"
- Re: Issue-152 ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding Publishing Edited Recommendations
- Re: Issue-152 ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding Publishing Edited Recommendations
- RE: Issue-152 ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding Publishing Edited Recommendations
- Issue-152 ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding Publishing Edited Recommendations
- Issue-159 ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Process Change Regarding the definition of "Editorial Change"
- w3process-ISSUE-159 (define editorial change): Remove the current circularity in definition of "editorial change" [Process Document]
- Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 7 April 2015
- Re: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- Re: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- RE: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- Re: Summarizing the state of Issue-152
- Re: Summarizing the state of Issue-152
Monday, 6 April 2015
- RE: Summarizing the state of Issue-152
- Re: Summarizing the state of Issue-152
- RE: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- RE: Comments on: W3C Process2015
- RE: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- Re: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- RE: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- RE: Summarizing the state of Issue-152
- Re: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- Re: Summarizing the state of Issue-152
- Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015
- Re: Summarizing the state of Issue-152
- Re: Summarizing the state of Issue-152
- RE: Summarizing the state of Issue-152
- Re: Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- RE: Summarizing the state of Issue-152
- Announcing FPWD pubs on p-review-announce [Was: Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015]
- Summarizing the state of Issue-152
- RE: Comments on: W3C Process2015
- RE: Comments on: W3C Process2015
- Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 7 April 2015
- RE: Comments on: W3C Process2015
- Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015
- Re: Comments on: W3C Process2015
- RE: Comments on: W3C Process2015