Thursday, 31 January 2008
- [Bug 5443] section 4.3.1.1 point 4 open to misinterpretation
- [Bug 5442] extra information in sml-if-schema.xsd
- [Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents
- [Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute
- [Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages
- [Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections
- [Bug 5428] unclear passages
- [Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording
- [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology
- [Bug 5419] 5.5 Schema Document Bindings unclear which bits are optional/not
- [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported
- [Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents
- [Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed
- [Bug 5411] Clarification of deref() rules
- [Bug 5409] Clarify use of term 'rule' in SML specification
- [Bug 5407] Explicitly mentioning dependent spec version numbers
- [Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed
- [Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications
- [Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- RE: bug fix process question
Wednesday, 30 January 2008
- [Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages
- [Bug 5443] section 4.3.1.1 point 4 open to misinterpretation
- [Bug 5442] extra information in sml-if-schema.xsd
Tuesday, 29 January 2008
- [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete
- bug fix process question
- [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete
- [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete
- [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete
- [Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute
- [Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents
- [Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute
- [Bug 5388] Definition of "Reference"
Monday, 28 January 2008
- RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-01-31 SML Teleconference
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-01-31 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 5415] clarify acyclic definition
- [Bug 5415] clarify acyclic definition
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF"
Saturday, 26 January 2008
- [Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents
- [Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF"
Friday, 25 January 2008
- [Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages
- [Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages
- [Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections
- [Bug 5428] unclear passages
- [Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording
- [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology
- [Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF"
- [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology
- [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology
- [Bug 5422] anchor for the {rules} notion, section 5.3 Rules Embedded in Schema Documents
- [Bug 5422] anchor for the {rules} notion, section 5.3 Rules Embedded in Schema Documents
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents
- [Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF"
- [Bug 5384] Uniqueness of alias URIs
- [Bug 5419] 5.5 Schema Document Bindings unclear which bits are optional/not
- [Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF"
- [Bug 5415] clarify acyclic definition
- [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported
- [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information
- [Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5415] clarify acyclic definition
Wednesday, 23 January 2008
- [Bug 5410] Repeating schematron specification contents
- [Bug 5410] Repeating schematron specification contents
- [Bug 5404] Remove all uses of the word "profile" for Schematron and Schema
- [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
- [Bug 5411] Clarification of deref() rules
- [Bug 5410] Repeating schematron specification contents
- [Bug 5409] Clarify use of term 'rule' in SML specification
- [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative
- [Bug 5407] Explicitly mentioning dependent spec version numbers
- [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming"
- [Bug 5405] Binding of Schematron constraints to elements or documents
- [Bug 5404] Remove all uses of the word "profile" for Schematron and Schema
- [Bug 5403] Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints"
- [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways"
- [Bug 5401] 4.3: Typo in Example
- [Bug 5397] SMLIF typos
- [Bug 5399] SML typos
- [Bug 5401] 4.3: Typo in Example
- [Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed
- [Bug 5379] Allow target* constraints on complex types
- [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete
- [Bug 5399] SML typos
- [Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications
- [Bug 5380] Clarify XSD vs. xsi:schemaLocation attribute
- [Bug 5380] Clarify XSD vs. xsi:schemaLocation attribute
- [Bug 5380] Clarify XSD vs. xsi:schemaLocation attribute
- [Bug 5397] SMLIF typos
- discussion proposal for bug 5395
- [Bug 4644] Allow assertions on local elements and types
Monday, 21 January 2008
- [Bug 4644] Allow assertions on local elements and types
- [Bug 4644] Allow assertions on local elements and types
- [Bug 4644] Allow assertions on local elements and types
- [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete
- [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information
- [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete
Sunday, 20 January 2008
Friday, 18 January 2008
- [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete
- [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information
- [w3c sml] Second version of proposal on 5306
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-17 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 5390] How to handle non-embedded documents referenced by EPRs in SML-IF
- [Bug 4644] Allow assertions on local elements and types
- [Bug 5382] Clarifying intention of section 4.4
- [Bug 5386] Use of xsi prefix in SML
- [Bug 5389] smlerr namespace still mentioned in SML and SML-IF spec
- [Bug 5383] Use of EPRs as SML-IF locators
- [Bug 4644] Allow assertions on local elements and types
Thursday, 17 January 2008
- [Bug 5390] How to handle non-embedded documents referenced by EPRs in SML-IF
- [Bug 5368] Issues with the published third draft, 01/14/2008
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances
- [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document
- [Bug 5388] Definition of "Reference"
- [Bug 5388] Definition of "Reference"
- [Bug 5387] Reference Scheme definition
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 5384] Uniqueness of alias URIs
- [Bug 5383] Use of EPRs as SML-IF locators
- [Bug 5380] Clarify XSD vs. xsi:schemaLocation attribute
- [Bug 5368] Issues with the published third draft, 01/14/2008
- RE: [w3c sml] Suggested updates to 4992 Target Identity
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 5389] smlerr namespace still mentioned in SML and SML-IF spec
- RE: [w3c sml] Suggested updates to 4992 Target Identity
- [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information
- [w3c sml] Suggested updates to 4992 Target Identity
- [Bug 5388] Definition of "Reference"
- [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information
- [Bug 5387] Reference Scheme definition
- [Bug 5386] Use of xsi prefix in SML
- [Bug 5383] Use of EPRs as SML-IF locators
- [Bug 5384] Uniqueness of alias URIs
Wednesday, 16 January 2008
- [Bug 5381] Spelling of pseudo schema
- [Bug 5382] Clarifying intention of section 4.4
- [Bug 5380] Clarify XSD vs. xsi:schemaLocation attribute
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 5384] Uniqueness of alias URIs
- [Bug 5383] Use of EPRs as SML-IF locators
- [Bug 5382] Clarifying intention of section 4.4
- [Bug 5381] Spelling of pseudo schema
- [Bug 5380] Clarify XSD vs. xsi:schemaLocation attribute
- [Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances
- Re: [w3c sml] Comments on third public draft SML-IF
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-01-17 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances
- [Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-10 SML Teleconference
- RE: meeting minutes Jan 10, 2008
- [Bug 5379] Allow target* constraints on complex types
- meeting minutes Jan 10, 2008
- [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information
- [w3c sml] Proposal for Issue 5306: Additional Header Information
- [Bug 5344] make changes related to the third public working draft
Tuesday, 15 January 2008
- [w3c sml] Comments on third public draft SML-IF
- [Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances
- [Bug 5368] Issues with the published third draft, 01/14/2008
- [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document
Thursday, 10 January 2008
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified?
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
- notes toward better understanding of bug 5063
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
Wednesday, 9 January 2008
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-01-10 SML
- RE: [w3c sml] Bug 4675 - SML-IF conformance concerns
- Re: [w3c sml] Bug 4675 - SML-IF conformance concerns
- Regrets for 1/10/08
Tuesday, 8 January 2008
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [w3c sml] Bug 4675 - SML-IF conformance concerns
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-010-03 SML conf call
Friday, 4 January 2008
- [w3c sml] [minutes] [vers 2] 2007-12-13 SML Teleconf Minutes
- [Bug 5344] make changes related to the third public working draft
Thursday, 3 January 2008
- [Bug 5341] EPR Reference Scheme Note
- [Bug 5303] Recognize URI scheme without schema assessment
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document
- Regrets for] 2008-01-03 SML Teleconference