- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:42:19 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5423 Summary: 2.2 terminology Product: SML Version: LC Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core+Interchange Format AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: johnarwe@us.ibm.com QAContact: public-sml@w3.org (1) Both: it would help readers if we document the "strategy" used to arrange the set of terms, e.g. as text between the heading and the def list. I think the current strategy is to "build up", so each definition can re-use terms already defined, but we do not do so in all cases so it is difficult to be sure. (2) SML: "Reference" probably should be "SML Reference". May be covered by 5388. (3) SML: The def for "model def docs" ends with "...in SML model validation." Later the term "model validation" is defined, but not "SML model validation". Rigorous consistency is most likely to help readers. (4) SML: The def of target complete URI refers to two terms not currently defined, "target" and "SML reference". The former probably needs to be added. The latter should be defined, and may already be covered by 5388. (5) SMLIF: SMLIF introduces some concepts not currently defined in 2.2 in either spec, that we should probably add, e.g. alias, schema document binding. (6) Both: SMLIF section 5.4 is titled "Rule Document Bindings", a term I see in neither spec's 2.2 content. Needs to be reconciled against the other rule/binding terms floating around.
Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 20:42:27 UTC