RE: [w3c sml] Suggested updates to 4992 Target Identity

When was the decision made that SML references *are* scheme instances?
(I must have missed that meeting.)  This decision changes my thinking on
Issue 5388, which I just entered an hour before I got this posting.

 

In SML 5.3.3, shouldn't "target-complete URIs" be "target-complete
identifiers" in the 2nd & 3rd items? :-).

 

Kirk Wilson, Ph.D.

Research Staff Member, CA Labs

603 823-7146 (preferred)

Cell:  603 991-8873

________________________________

From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Sandy Gao
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:40 AM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: [w3c sml] Suggested updates to 4992 Target Identity

 


4992 Object identity needs to be clarified 

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4992 

The attached are suggested changes to texts around the "target-complete"
concept, with rationales recorded in comments. Pick your favorite
format. :-) 



Thanks,
Sandy Gao
XML Technologies, IBM Canada
Editor, W3C XML Schema WG <http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema/> 
Member, W3C SML WG <http://www.w3.org/XML/SML/> 
(1-905) 413-3255 T/L 313-3255