- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:29:42 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5382
kumarp@microsoft.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Keywords|editorial |needsReview
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #2 from kumarp@microsoft.com 2008-01-18 09:29 -------
The sentence "This proposal..." was odd given the surrounding context. The
following change was made to fix this.
From:
So it is clear that SML-IF cannot guarantee general case interoperability based
only on XML Schema given the constraints above and, therefore, needs to specify
how to determine such associations. This proposal concerns only SML model
validation and not SML-IF validation (against the IF schema). Unless otherwise
indicated, "validation" or "validity" in the following sections refers to SML
model validation.
To:
So it is clear that SML-IF cannot guarantee general case interoperability
based only on XML Schema given the constraints above and, therefore, needs to
specify how to determine such associations. This section describes a method to
achieve this goal.
Received on Friday, 18 January 2008 09:32:56 UTC