RE: [w3c sml] Suggested updates to 4992 Target Identity

Kirk,

> When was the decision made that SML references *are* scheme instances?

When we adopted the "reference proposal"? The latest proposal is in [1]. 
Section 3 is where this is discussed, especially bullet 1.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2007Sep/0268.html

> In SML 5.3.3, shouldn?t ?target-complete URIs? be ?target-complete 
identifiers? 

Oops ...

Thanks,
Sandy Gao
XML Technologies, IBM Canada
Editor, W3C XML Schema WG
Member, W3C SML WG
(1-905) 413-3255 T/L 313-3255
 



"Wilson, Kirk D" <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com> 
2008-01-17 10:32 AM

To
Sandy Gao/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, <public-sml@w3.org>
cc

Subject
RE: [w3c sml] Suggested updates to 4992 Target Identity






When was the decision made that SML references *are* scheme instances?  (I 
must have missed that meeting.)  This decision changes my thinking on 
Issue 5388, which I just entered an hour before I got this posting.
 
In SML 5.3.3, shouldn?t ?target-complete URIs? be ?target-complete 
identifiers? in the 2nd & 3rd items? J.
 
Kirk Wilson, Ph.D.
Research Staff Member, CA Labs
603 823-7146 (preferred)
Cell:  603 991-8873

From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On 
Behalf Of Sandy Gao
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:40 AM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: [w3c sml] Suggested updates to 4992 Target Identity
 

4992 Object identity needs to be clarified 

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4992 

The attached are suggested changes to texts around the "target-complete" 
concept, with rationales recorded in comments. Pick your favorite format. 
:-) 



Thanks,
Sandy Gao
XML Technologies, IBM Canada
Editor, W3C XML Schema WG
Member, W3C SML WG
(1-905) 413-3255 T/L 313-3255