public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org from September 2017 by author

Benjamin Young

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Thursday, 7 September)

Bruce Miller

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)

Deyan Ginev

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Wednesday, 6 September)

Gareth Oakes

• RE: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Sunday, 10 September)

Ivan Herman

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Friday, 8 September)

Johannes Wilm

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Sunday, 10 September)
• Fwd: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Wednesday, 6 September)
• html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Wednesday, 6 September)

Kevin Hawkins

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Sunday, 10 September)

Peter Murray-Rust

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Wednesday, 6 September)

Robin Berjon

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Wednesday, 6 September)

Rzepa, Henry S

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Sunday, 10 September)

Sarven Capadisli

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Wednesday, 6 September)

Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken

• RE: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Monday, 11 September)

Silvio Peroni

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Wednesday, 6 September)

Last message date: Monday, 11 September 2017 12:04:00 UTC