W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org > September 2017

Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli?

From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 23:28:03 +0200
To: public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org
Message-ID: <896b8e0f-f556-d53e-c8f9-c5760fe8f245@csarven.ca>
On 2017-09-09 22:55, Silvio Peroni wrote:
> Hi Sarven, all,
> 
>> * authors have the freedom to express themselves as accurately as they
>> can, typically within the scope of the language (HTML5).
> 
> Well, in principle and for what concern SH-CG, I’m not against the
> possibility of using of the whole the tags of HTML5. 


I did not imply that SH should use everything in HTML5. I thought the
rest of the points I've drafted go together, and makes that clear.

It was about not setting constraints in SH (like n elements to cover
everything there is to cover in the whole scholarly information
universe), and then when something goes wrong, the data pipeline breaks.
It is a given that users and tools make errors. SH will in no way be an
exception to that rule, whether it says 5 or 50 are permitted. In
addition to that, the consequence of such action is that, it prematurely
draws boundaries on what the authors desire to express today as well as
in the future.

-Sarven
http://csarven.ca/#i
Received on Saturday, 9 September 2017 21:28:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 9 September 2017 21:28:28 UTC