Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli?

On 2017-09-09 21:08, Bruce Miller wrote:
> It would seem more productive to focus on the metadata magic
> (RDFa, Aria,...) to indicate the data's meaning & purpose,
> rather than to try to make HTML actually semantic after-the-fact.

I agree completely.

It is precisely the approach that dokieli takes with RDF(a) meanwhile
making the best of what HTML5 has to offer.

-Sarven
http://csarven.ca/#i

Received on Saturday, 9 September 2017 19:45:02 UTC