W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org > September 2017

Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli?

From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 21:44:38 +0200
To: public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org
Message-ID: <9699b8ad-c9b7-6aa0-86bd-1edb31545d08@csarven.ca>
On 2017-09-09 21:08, Bruce Miller wrote:
> It would seem more productive to focus on the metadata magic
> (RDFa, Aria,...) to indicate the data's meaning & purpose,
> rather than to try to make HTML actually semantic after-the-fact.

I agree completely.

It is precisely the approach that dokieli takes with RDF(a) meanwhile
making the best of what HTML5 has to offer.

-Sarven
http://csarven.ca/#i
Received on Saturday, 9 September 2017 19:45:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 9 September 2017 19:45:02 UTC