W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org > September 2017

Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli?

From: Silvio Peroni <silvio.peroni@unibo.it>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 13:18:00 +0200
Message-ID: <209D86C4-03BD-4A9D-92FE-B7BE85E7EACB@unibo.it>
CC: Scholarly HTML community group <public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org>, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
To: Johannes Wilm <mail@johanneswilm.org>
Hi Johannes,

> Speaking of which -- I noticed that a lot of those formats and tools exporting into many of the same formats (ODT, LaTeX, EPUB - also we do this). But how about the XML formats that many publishers use: JATS, DocBook. You mention those as potential export formats, but is anyone working on actual exporters?

Actually, I’m now working on a JATS exporter because I would like to provide my article to the publisher in that format. I’ll let you know when it is ready – but I need to quickly finish it ASAP indeed.

Have a nice day :-)


Silvio Peroni, Ph.D.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy)
Tel: +39 051 2095393
E-mail: silvio.peroni@unibo.it
Web: https://www.unibo.it/sitoweb/silvio.peroni/en
Twitter: essepuntato

Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2017 11:18:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:01 UTC