Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli?

All,

I finally took some time to read this thread.

Days ago Robin summarized our situation ...

On 9/6/17 2:32 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
> This group here has:
>
>   • A clear a strong level of interest;
>   • An overall good idea of what's required (a Web-based replacement for
> JATS);
>   • The right technical knowledge;
>   • The right community to provide feedback;
>   • All the infrastructure.

For that second bullet, I want to draw people's attention to the Texture 
toolset ( http://substance.io/texture/ ) in case you're not aware of it. 
  It backing from some major organizations in the open-access scholarly 
publishing community.

--Kevin

Received on Sunday, 10 September 2017 20:33:50 UTC