Tuesday, 31 July 2007
- 2007.07.31.RIF.minutes.html
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
Thursday, 26 July 2007
Monday, 30 July 2007
Saturday, 28 July 2007
Friday, 27 July 2007
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- Re: Notes on 7/20 BLD draft
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
Thursday, 26 July 2007
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- Final date/location information for F2F7
- Re: Notes on 7/20 BLD draft
- RE: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- [Admin] Draft minutes Telecon 24 July 2007 - revised2
- Re: Notes on 7/20 BLD draft
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
Wednesday, 25 July 2007
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- Application-specific data model options
- Action 330 completed: update Arch/DataSets
- [Admin] Draft minutes Telecon 24 July 2007 - revised
- Re: Notes on 7/20 BLD draft
- Re: Notes on 7/20 BLD draft
- Re: Notes on 7/20 BLD draft
Tuesday, 24 July 2007
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- Re: Notes on 7/20 BLD draft
- Re: Notes on 7/20 BLD draft
- [Admin] Draft minutes Telecon 24 July 2007
- Re: Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- Issues with classification a#b, a##b
- Re: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: [BLD] Data types and IRIs (was: Re: Action 299 - removing sorts)
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- Re: [BLD] Signatures (BLD 7/20)
- Status page? was: Re: [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 24 July (CORRIGENDUM 2)
- Re: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: [BLD] Data types and IRIs
- Re: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- [BLD] Data types and IRIs (was: Re: Action 299 - removing sorts)
- Re: [BLD] Signatures (BLD 7/20)
- Re: Notes on 7/20 BLD draft
- Re: [BLD] Signatures (BLD 7/20)
- Re: [BLD] Signatures (BLD 7/20)
- Re: [BLD] Signatures (BLD 7/20)
- Re: [BLD] Signatures (BLD 7/20)
- Re: [BLD] Signatures (BLD 7/20)
- Re: sorts needed for extensibility? (Re: Action 299 - removing sorts)
- [BLD] Signatures (BLD 7/20)
- Re: Notes on 7/20 BLD draft
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- Re: Notes on 7/20 BLD draft
- ACTION-305: Review Paula's Phase 2 requirements and discuss
- Re: Notes on 7/20 BLD draft
- sorts needed for extensibility? (Re: Action 299 - removing sorts)
Monday, 23 July 2007
- RE: Notes on 7/20 BLD draft
- Re: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- Re: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Notes on 7/20 BLD draft
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 24 July (CORRIGENDUM 2)
- [Admin] Revised minutes for 17 July telecon
- Re: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- Re: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 24 July (ADDENDUM+ CORRIGENDUM)
Friday, 20 July 2007
- ADMIN: Minutes of 17 July 2007 Telecon
- Re: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- REMINDER: Complete F2F7 questionnaire by Monday night (was: [Fwd: Poll on next RIF F2F meeting])
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 24 July
- Re: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
Thursday, 19 July 2007
- [Admin] W3C Co-Sponsoring of RuleML-2007 Symposium: Rule Interchange Forum
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- European Master in Computational Logic - openings and scholarships for Europeans
Wednesday, 18 July 2007
Tuesday, 17 July 2007
- RE: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- Re: ACTION-314 (Re: [TED] ACTION-294: Propose a treatment of sequences)
- RE: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- Re: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- RE: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- [TED] ACTION-160 DONE
- RE: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- RE: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- Re: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: RIF Serialization Strawman (more on ACTION-309 [1])
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- Re: [Arch] ACTION-253: Experiment with modularization of Condition library
- Re: RIF Serialization Strawman (more on ACTION-309 [1])
- RE: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- RIF Serialization Strawman (more on ACTION-309 [1])
- [Arch] ACTION-253: Experiment with modularization of Condition library
Monday, 16 July 2007
- RE: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- Re: Action 299 - removing sorts
- Action 299 - removing sorts
- Action 299 - removing sorts
- Re: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: how to approach Const?
- Re: how to approach Const?
- RE: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: how to approach Const?
Sunday, 15 July 2007
- Datamodel Strawman (ACTION-298)
- Re: ASN issue: leaf class == visible class?
- One Week Extension for Paper Submission: OIC 2007, Ontology for the Intelligence Community, Nov. 28-30, 2007; Due: July 22, 2007
Saturday, 14 July 2007
Friday, 13 July 2007
- RE: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- RE: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- RE: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- Re: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- how to approach Const?
- Re: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- Re: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- Re: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- Re: ASN issue: leaf class == visible class?
- Re: ASN issue: leaf class == visible class?
- RE: ASN issue: leaf class == visible class?
- Focusing RIF work in task forces
- Re: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- Re: ASN issue: leaf class == visible class?
- RE: ASN issue: leaf class == visible class?
- XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
- RE: ASN issue: leaf class == visible class?
Thursday, 12 July 2007
Wednesday, 11 July 2007
Tuesday, 10 July 2007
Monday, 9 July 2007
- Final Call for Papers: OIC 2007: Ontology for the Intelligence Community, Nov. 28-30, 2007, Columbia, MD, USA (1 week for paper submissions)
- Re: "entailment regime"?
- [RIF Dialect metadata - was Re: "entailment regime"?
- [RIF Dialect metadata - was Re: "entailment regime"?
- Re: [Arch] Action 319
- Re: "entailment regime"?
- Re: "entailment regime"?
- Re: "entailment regime"?
Sunday, 8 July 2007
Friday, 6 July 2007
- SAWSDL
- Re: [Arch] Action 319
- CFP: ACM Web Information and Data Management workshop
- [Arch] Action 319
Thursday, 5 July 2007
- Action xx: What is required in core to support RDF
- Re: ACTION-314 (Re: [TED] ACTION-294: Propose a treatment of sequences)
- Re: How core is Core?
Wednesday, 4 July 2007
- RE: How core is Core?
- Re: "entailment regime"?
- Re: "entailment regime"?
- Re: [Arch] ACTION-259 Start OWL/RDF compatibility section of Arch document
- Re: [Arch] ACTION-259 Start OWL/RDF compatibility section of Arch document
- "entailment regime"?
- Re: [Arch] ACTION-259 Start OWL/RDF compatibility section of Arch document
- Re: [Arch] ACTION-259 Start OWL/RDF compatibility section of Arch document
- Re: [Arch] ACTION-259 Start OWL/RDF compatibility section of Arch document
- Re: [Arch] ACTION-259 Start OWL/RDF compatibility section of Arch document
- Re: How core is Core?
Tuesday, 3 July 2007
Wednesday, 4 July 2007
Tuesday, 3 July 2007
- Re: [RIF] F2F7
- Re: How core is Core?
- Re: How core is Core?
- Re: [Arch] ACTION-259 Start OWL/RDF compatibility section of Arch document
- RE: [Admin] F2F7 Hosting Proposal by NRC
- Re: [Admin] F2F7 Hosting Proposal by NRC
- [Admin] F2F7 Hosting Proposal by NRC
- RE: [RIF] F2F7
- Re: [Arch] ACTION-259 Start OWL/RDF compatibility section of Arch document
- [RIF] F2F7
- Re: [Arch] ACTION-259 Start OWL/RDF compatibility section of Arch document
- Re: [Arch] ACTION-259 Start OWL/RDF compatibility section of Arch document
- today's meeting record
- Re: [Arch] ACTION-259 Start OWL/RDF compatibility section of Arch document
- Re: How core is Core?
- [Arch] ACTION-318 strawman PR extension cum RIF Core compatibility
- Re: How core is Core?
- ACTION-314 (Re: [TED] ACTION-294: Propose a treatment of sequences)
- Re: How core is Core?