- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:30:30 +0100
- To: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Michael Kifer wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/299 has been completed. Part > of the title of this action says: "handle datatypes as in RDF." This was > *not* what was resolved at the F2F and was put in there by mistake (I > hope). Certainly, I would not have agreed to such an action, since I do > not know what this might mean in logic. > > Other than that, the main changes are in > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Core/Positive_Conditions > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Core/Slotted_Conditions (to a much > lesser extent). Just looking at the latter I see that still includes CLASSIFICATION as well as FRAME. Whilst we did not vote to remove CLASSIFICATION there was opposition to it whereas we did resolve to adopt FRAME. How crucial is CLASSIFICATION to the design? Dave -- Hewlett-Packard Limited Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:30:48 UTC