RE: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)

"Boley, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca> writes:
> I know.
> 
> Yet, developing/maintaining two schemas would be harder
> than developing/maintaining one, Harold

My proposal is that the only thing we need to maintain is the asn07.

The XML Schema is derived at runtime by software.

     - s

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Reynolds [mailto:der@hplb.hpl.hp.com]=20
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:59 AM
> To: Boley, Harold
> Cc: Sandro Hawke; public-rif-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: XML Syntax Strawman (ACTION-309)
> 
> Boley, Harold wrote:
> 
> >> Can you give me an example of how this might be so, other than
> support
> >> for xsi:type?   (I'm still working on that one, and I'll grant that
> it
> >> might turn out to be compelling.)
> >=20
> > One example is that RDF/XML does not support perfect XSD validation
> > before first also fixing an RDF Schema.
> 
> But surely Sandro's proposal does precisely that.
> 
> The end result is something which happens to be well-formed RDF/XML but=20
> does not break schema validation.
> 
> If we allowed open metadata that would break schema validation but, as I
> 
> understand it, Sandro is proposing restricting that. See the discussion=20
> under (c) in=20
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2007Jul/0067.html
> 
> Dave
> --=20
> Hewlett-Packard Limited
> Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
> Registered No: 690597 England
>

Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 15:32:00 UTC