Alex Kozlenkov
Axel Polleres
- Re: [TEST] simple SPARQL condition and SNAF condition
- [RIF] Completed Action 94: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/94
- Re: Issue-12 and the next UCR draft
- Re: Issue-12 and the next UCR draft
Bijan Parsia
- Re: report on coverage issue
- Re: Issue-12 and the next UCR draft
- Re: Issue-12 and the next UCR draft
- Re: Issue-12 and the next UCR draft
Boley, Harold
- RE: [RIF] Extensible Design: Horn semantics and syntax actionscompleted
- [RIF] Core Design: Started a new wiki page
- [RIF] Extensible Design: Horn semantics and syntax actions completed
- RE: [RIF] Homework for 9/12 RIF telecon -- ACTION-102
Chris Welty
- Main topic for next RIF telecon
- Re: [TEST] simple SPARQL condition and SNAF condition
- Homework for 9/12 RIF telecon
- [Admin] RDF of RIF Agenda template (you can probably ignore this)
- [RIF] Homework for Sept 4 telecon
- Re: FO semantics for condition language (Action 84)
- [SWC] Phase I semantic web requirements
Christian de Sainte Marie
- Re: [UCR] Action 9 and discussion of UCs
- Re: [UCR] Action 9 and discussion of UCs
- [UCR] UC clarification (completes action 96)
- [Admin] Agenda Sept 26 telecon
- Re: [UCR] Action 9 and discussion of UCs
- Re: F2F5 - any moves?
- [UCR] Action 9 and discussion of UCs
- [Admin] Agenda Sept 19 telecon
- [Admin] Agenda for Sept 12 telecon
- Repost: Agenda for Sept 5 telecon
- [RIF] Agenda for Sept 5 telecon
Dan Connolly
- RE: [RIF] Extensible Design: Horn semantics and syntax actionscompleted
- Re: [RIF] Extensible Design: Horn semantics and syntax... RDF/OWL integration conventions
- Re: [RIF] Extensible Design: Horn semantics and syntax actions completed
- Re: [RIF] Extensible Design: Horn semantics and syntax actions completed
- Re: Homework for 9/12 RIF telecon
Dave Reynolds
- Re: Issue #3
- RDF syntax for RIF
- RIF must cover RDF triples as data
- Re: [UCR] Action 9 and discussion of UCs
- Re: [UCR] Action 9 and discussion of UCs
- Re: Issue-12 and the next UCR draft
- Issue-12 and the next UCR draft
- Suggested close for Issue-6#3
- Re: [RIF] Draft minutes for August 29 2006 meeting
David Z. Hirtle
ewallace@cme.nist.gov
Francis McCabe
Francois Bry
- Re: [UCR] Action 9 and discussion of UCs
- Re: [TEST] simple SPARQL condition and SNAF condition
- Re: report on coverage issue
- Re: Issue-12 and the next UCR draft
Ginsberg, Allen
- report on coverage issue
- pointers to "coverage" definitions
- Action 101
- [RIF] [ADMIN] Draft minutes of September 5 telecon
- [public-rif-wg] <none>
- previous work on linking use cases to requirements
Hassan Aït-Kaci
Innovimax W3C
- Re: [RIF] [ADMIN] Draft minutes for 19 September 2006
- Re: [RIF] [ADMIN] Draft minutes for 19 September 2006
jos.deroo@agfa.com
- Re: [RIF] Extensible Design: Horn semantics and syntax... RDF/OWL integration conventions
- Re: [TEST] simple SPARQL condition and SNAF condition
- Re: [TEST] simple SPARQL condition and SNAF condition
- [TEST] simple SPARQL condition and SNAF condition
- Re: Issue-12 and the next UCR draft
Mala Mehrotra
- [RIF] [ADMIN] Draft minutes for 26th September 2006 - (corrected)
- [RIF] [ADMIN] Draft minutes for 12 September 2006
Michael Kifer
- RuleML conference and OWLED workshop right after RIF f2f and ISWC2006
- Re: semantic basis for positive conditions (action 110)
- F2F5 - any moves?
- Re: semantic basis for positive conditions (action 110)
- Re: registration for F2F4
- Re: FO semantics for condition language (Action 84)
Mike Dean
Nichols, Deborah L.
Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- semantic basis for positive conditions (action 110)
- more on registration for F2F4 - ISWC2006 early registration closes this Friday
- [RIF] [ADMIN] Draft minutes for 12 September 2006
- registration for F2F4