- From: Francis McCabe <frankmccabe@mac.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:43:34 -0700
- To: W3C RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
This comment was added to the issue tracker regarding issue #4: ----- There was some discussion about this issue which I was not party to. However, the reason that a compliance model supports interoperability is that a formal understanding of what it means to comply to the RIF is *essential* to the succesful use of RIF, and hence to interoperability. The alternative to a formal compliance model is an informal one: i.e., that defined by what popular tools support. The requirement was dropped, but I believe erroneously. ----- Frank
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 02:43:39 UTC