- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:04:43 -0400
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
I have read over the revised semantics for positive conditions. http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/A.1_Basis%3A_Positive_Conditions In general it is fine. I have a few suggestions on wording changes, given below: 1/ At the core of the definition of a semantic structure is the idea that an interpretation provides a truth value for a formula. I don't think that I should be used here. 2/ D a non-empty set (of domain elements), Con the set of syntax elements recognized by the Con / entity production, Var the set of syntax elements recognized by the Var / ?name production, Fun the set of syntax elements recognized by the Fun production, Rel the set of syntax elements recognized by the Rel production. 3/ Clean up the definition of I* to something like I*=<IC,IV*,IF,IR> where IV* is the same as IV except possibly on the variables v1,...,vn
Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2006 14:05:23 UTC