public-rdfa-wg@w3.org from October 2011 by date

Monday, 31 October 2011

• Re: The processing rules for property/rel Gregg Kellogg
• Re: The processing rules for property/rel Niklas Lindström
• Re: The processing rules for property/rel Gregg Kellogg
• Re: More general thoughts on the @property change Gregg Kellogg
• Re Re: The processing rules for property/rel Ivan Herman
• Linking to @about in RDFa Lite? Sebastian Heath
• Re: The processing rules for property/rel Ivan Herman
• The processing rules for property/rel Ivan Herman
• Re: FYI: W3C editor's draft for RDFa 1.1 Lite Peter Mika
• More general thoughts on the @property change Ivan Herman
• FYI: W3C editor's draft for RDFa 1.1 Lite Ivan Herman

Saturday, 29 October 2011

• Re: Dublin Core citation in RDFa 1.1 Primer - also "unconstrained" properties Thomas Baker
• Re: Dublin Core citation in RDFa 1.1 Primer - also "unconstrained" properties Ivan Herman
• Re: Support for the <data> element Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-113 (Using the data element): Add the value attribute of the HTML data element as a possible literal target for property [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Support for the <data> element Jeni Tennison

Friday, 28 October 2011

• Dublin Core citation in RDFa 1.1 Primer - also "unconstrained" properties Thomas Baker
• Re: Re 2: The processing rules for property/rel Niklas Lindström
• Re: Re 2: The processing rules for property/rel Gregg Kellogg
• Re 2: The processing rules for property/rel Ivan Herman
• Re: The processing rules for property/rel Ivan Herman
• Re: The processing rules for property/rel Gregg Kellogg
• The processing rules for property/rel Ivan Herman

Thursday, 27 October 2011

• Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel Henri Sivonen
• Telecon Agenda - October 27th 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny

Wednesday, 26 October 2011

• Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel Gregg Kellogg
• Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 25 October 2011

• Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel Gregg Kellogg
• Re: RDFa 1.1 Issues raised by Google Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel Ivan Herman

Monday, 24 October 2011

• Re: ISSUE-112 (RDFParser and DataParser): RDFParser doesn't extend DataParser [RDF API] Nathan
• Re: RDF 1.1 Lite Issue # 2: property vs rel Gregg Kellogg
• ISSUE-112 (RDFParser and DataParser): RDFParser doesn't extend DataParser [RDF API] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: RDFa 1.1 Issues raised by Google Toby Inkster
• Important! Fwd: Daylight Savings Time change Ivan Herman
• Re: Object Memory Modeling XG and RDFa Jens Haupert
• Re: RDFa 1.1 Issues raised by Google Gregg Kellogg
• RDFa 1.1 Issues raised by Google Manu Sporny

Sunday, 23 October 2011

• Re: Editorial change in the RDFa Core: parameters in accessing the processor graph? Shane McCarron

Saturday, 22 October 2011

• Editorial change in the RDFa Core: parameters in accessing the processor graph? Ivan Herman
• Re: Updated Editor's Draft Ivan Herman

Friday, 21 October 2011

• Re: Updated Editor's Draft Shane McCarron
• Re: Consider adding schema.org to RDFa core default profile Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Consider adding schema.org to RDFa core default profile Ivan Herman
• Re: Consider adding schema.org to RDFa core default profile Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Consider adding schema.org to RDFa core default profile Thomas Steiner
• Created/Updated the initial context files Ivan Herman
• Re: Updated Editor's Draft Ivan Herman
• Re: Updated Editor's Draft Shane McCarron
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Ivan Herman
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Ivan Herman
• Re: Updated Editor's Draft Ivan Herman
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Toby Inkster
• Re: Updated Editor's Draft Ivan Herman
• Default context setups... (fwd Questions on the Link Registry for RDFa (ACTION-100)) Ivan Herman
• Re: Questions on the Link Registry for RDFa (ACTION-100) Ivan Herman
• Re: Consider adding schema.org to RDFa core default profile Ivan Herman
• Consider adding schema.org to RDFa core default profile Stéphane Corlosquet

Thursday, 20 October 2011

• Re: Questions on the Link Registry for RDFa (ACTION-100) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Telecon Agenda - October 20th 2011, 1400 UTC Knud Möller
• Re: Updated Editor's Draft Shane McCarron
• Re: Updated Editor's Draft Shane McCarron
• Re: Updated Editor's Draft Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Updated Editor's Draft Shane McCarron
• Re: Updated Editor's Draft Gregg Kellogg
• Updated drafts available Shane McCarron
• Updated Editor's Draft Shane McCarron
• Re: Telecon Agenda - October 20th 2011, 1400 UTC Stéphane Corlosquet
• Fwd: Questions on the Link Registry for RDFa (ACTION-100) Ivan Herman
• Questions on the Link Registry for RDFa (ACTION-100) Ivan Herman
• Questions on the Link Registry for RDFa (ACTION-100) Ivan Herman
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Shane McCarron
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Shane McCarron
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Ivan Herman
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Shane McCarron
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Ivan Herman
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Telecon Agenda - October 20th 2011, 1400 UTC Thomas Steiner
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Ivan Herman
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Henry S. Thompson

Wednesday, 19 October 2011

• RE: How to deal with an <a> link applied to a person's name Michael Steidl \(IPTC\)
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Shane McCarron
• Re: Support for integration with XML is broken Toby Inkster
• Support for integration with XML is broken Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Comments on ISSUE-108 (Link relations) Ivan Herman
• Re: Object Memory Modeling XG and RDFa Alexander Kröner

Tuesday, 18 October 2011

• Re: Comments on ISSUE-108 (Link relations) Jeni Tennison
• Telecon Agenda - October 20th 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny

Friday, 14 October 2011

• Re: Draft response to ISSUE-105: @itemref support Jeni Tennison
• Re: More direct conversion from microdata to RDFa? Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Comments on ISSUE-108 (Link relations) Ivan Herman
• Re: Comments on ISSUE-108 (Link relations) Shane McCarron
• Comments on ISSUE-108 (Link relations) Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF Web Apps WG telecon minutes for 2011-10-13 (ISSUE-111) Ivan Herman
• Re: More direct conversion from microdata to RDFa? Ivan Herman
• Re: More direct conversion from microdata to RDFa? Ivan Herman

Thursday, 13 October 2011

• Re: How to deal with an <a> link applied to a person's name Toby Inkster
• Re: RDF Web Apps WG telecon minutes for 2011-10-13 Toby Inkster
• RDF Web Apps WG telecon minutes for 2011-10-13 Manu Sporny
• Re: How to deal with an <a> link applied to a person's name Toby Inkster
• Re: More direct conversion from microdata to RDFa? Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: More direct conversion from microdata to RDFa? Stéphane Corlosquet
• ACTION-97: What the working group discussed today Shane McCarron
• Re: ACTION-97: comments on link relations Shane McCarron
• Re: How to deal with an <a> link applied to a person's name Toby Inkster
• Re: More direct conversion from microdata to RDFa? Toby Inkster
• Re: ACTION-97: comments on link relations Ivan Herman
• Re: ACTION-97: comments on link relations Toby Inkster
• Re: ACTION-97: comments on link relations Toby Inkster
• Re: ACTION-97: comments on link relations Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 12 October 2011

• ACTION-97: comments on link relations Shane McCarron
• Re: How to deal with an <a> link applied to a person's name Jeni Tennison
• Re: Telecon Agenda - October 13th 2011, 1400 UTC Thomas Steiner
• Re: Telecon Agenda - October 13th 2011, 1400 UTC Ivan Herman
• Telecon Agenda - October 13th 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny
• Re: How to deal with an <a> link applied to a person's name Stéphane Corlosquet
• Fwd: How to deal with an <a> link applied to a person's name Manu Sporny
• Re: More direct conversion from microdata to RDFa? Ivan Herman
• More direct conversion from microdata to RDFa? Stéphane Corlosquet

Tuesday, 11 October 2011

• Re: Official response to RDFWA WG ISSUE-106: Ordered lists Jeni Tennison
• Job Opening: Social Semantic Web at DERI, NUI Galway (Postdoc Researcher) John Breslin

Monday, 10 October 2011

• Re: Object Memory Modeling XG and RDFa Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-111 (@inlist and @rev): Determine behavior when @inlist and @rev are used together [RDFa 1.1 Core] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDFa 1.1 and plain literals Manu Sporny
• Cleaned up actions Manu Sporny
• HTML5 LINK/META Elements in flow content Manu Sporny

Sunday, 9 October 2011

• IPTC, rNews and RDFa support Manu Sporny
• Official response to RDFWA WG ISSUE-106: Ordered lists Manu Sporny

Thursday, 6 October 2011

• Re: Telecon Agenda - October 6th 2011, 1400 UTC Ivan Herman
• Re: Telecon Agenda - October 6th 2011, 1400 UTC Knud Hinnerk Möller
• Re: Telecon Agenda - October 6th 2011, 1400 UTC Ted Thibodeau Jr

Wednesday, 5 October 2011

• Re: Object Memory Modeling XG and RDFa Alexander Kröner
• Re: Telecon Agenda - October 6th 2011, 1400 UTC Ivan Herman
• Re: Telecon Agenda - October 6th 2011, 1400 UTC Gregg Kellogg
• Telecon Agenda - October 6th 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny

Last message date: Monday, 31 October 2011 21:56:49 UTC