- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:56:41 -0500
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
On 10/21/2011 7:51 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > Hi Shane, > > On Oct 21, 2011, at 14:34 , Shane McCarron wrote: > > [snip] >>> - Section 9, RDFa Initial Contexts: I think we should also list HTML5+RDFa as an approved host language. (I know there is a reference problem, though, RDFa core will be a standard before HTML5... nevertheless, we cannot simply ignore the HTML5 version). >> Absolutely not. We can't reference something that isn't close to done. If you want to reference HTML4+RDFa, I wouldn't object. >> > But the way it is written now is that I cannot put an HTML5+RDFa document there which, eventually, will become really foolish. > > But the text says 'currently'. So that may be good enough for now. Actually, the way it written now you cannot use HTML5+RDFa exclusively. You MUST use an approved format. You may also use any other serialization you want. JSON, for example. > > >>> >>> I have made some minor changes on the Overview-src file (careful with the cvs:-) >>> >>> - in the explanation of the procedure, in entry 2, 3 and 4, I have added the term 'initial' context where those lists have to be updated (with a reference to the sequence) >> I don't see where you changed anything here, but I don't think the sequence should talk about the initial context at all. The sequence talks about the evaluation context, which is 'initialized' before processing starts. > The text now says, for example: > > [[[ > For every subject with a pair of predicates that have the values rdfa:prefix and rdfa:uri, create a key-value mapping from the rdfa:prefix object literal (the key) to the rdfa:uri object literal (the value). Add this mapping to the list of IRI mappings of the initial evaluation context, after transforming the 'prefix' component to lower-case. > ]]] > > your version did not say 'initial evaluation context'. This is the term used in 7.5 and where it is referenced back here. What is the problem with that? Hmm. I might word smith this a tad more. The thing we agreed upon is 'initial context' for the start of processing, and 'evaluation context' for what happens when processing is ongoing. > > Ivan > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > -- Shane McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. +1 763 786 8160 x120
Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 21:57:08 UTC