- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 08:38:18 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <2D3E506C-79DD-4145-A0EA-DF3EA79B6D86@w3.org>
On Oct 21, 2011, at 23:56 , Shane McCarron wrote: [snip] > > > On 10/21/2011 7:51 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >> Hi Shane, >> >> On Oct 21, 2011, at 14:34 , Shane McCarron wrote: >> >> [snip] >>>> - Section 9, RDFa Initial Contexts: I think we should also list HTML5+RDFa as an approved host language. (I know there is a reference problem, though, RDFa core will be a standard before HTML5... nevertheless, we cannot simply ignore the HTML5 version). >>> Absolutely not. We can't reference something that isn't close to done. If you want to reference HTML4+RDFa, I wouldn't object. >>> >> But the way it is written now is that I cannot put an HTML5+RDFa document there which, eventually, will become really foolish. >> >> But the text says 'currently'. So that may be good enough for now. > > Actually, the way it written now you cannot use HTML5+RDFa exclusively. You MUST use an approved format. You may also use any other serialization you want. JSON, for example. > But as soon as HTML5+RDFa becomes approved, it becomes automatically one of those. What I do not want is to exclude HTML5 until a next release of the Recommendation. That would be silly. But I guess the 'currently' exactly does it... >> >> >>>> >>>> I have made some minor changes on the Overview-src file (careful with the cvs:-) >>>> >>>> - in the explanation of the procedure, in entry 2, 3 and 4, I have added the term 'initial' context where those lists have to be updated (with a reference to the sequence) >>> I don't see where you changed anything here, but I don't think the sequence should talk about the initial context at all. The sequence talks about the evaluation context, which is 'initialized' before processing starts. >> The text now says, for example: >> >> [[[ >> For every subject with a pair of predicates that have the values rdfa:prefix and rdfa:uri, create a key-value mapping from the rdfa:prefix object literal (the key) to the rdfa:uri object literal (the value). Add this mapping to the list of IRI mappings of the initial evaluation context, after transforming the 'prefix' component to lower-case. >> ]]] >> >> your version did not say 'initial evaluation context'. This is the term used in 7.5 and where it is referenced back here. What is the problem with that? > > Hmm. I might word smith this a tad more. The thing we agreed upon is 'initial context' for the start of processing, and 'evaluation context' for what happens when processing is ongoing. Oops, sorry... Ivan > >> >> Ivan >> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > Shane McCarron > Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. > +1 763 786 8160 x120 > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Saturday, 22 October 2011 06:36:38 UTC