- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:13:29 -0500
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
I agree that we discussed this. What I remember is that people didn't want to have to have their parsers support namespaced attributes because it would mean a lot more work. Manu? On 10/19/2011 11:10 AM, Toby Inkster wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:44:02 +0100 > ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) wrote: > >> The document must use the attributes defined in this specification in >> 'no namespace'. > We did discuss this on a call many months ago, and I thought we'd > decided that XML host languages could optionally place the RDFa > attributes into a specific namespace. (I think it may have been > "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml".) > > OpenDocument 1.2 uses the RDFa attributes in the > "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" namespace. > -- Shane McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. +1 763 786 8160 x120
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 16:14:06 UTC