- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:01:34 -0500
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
- CC: jeni@jenitennison.com, tai@g5n.co.uk, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Hey folks, I had this action to look at the link relations we define in [1] vs. the ones defined in [2] to determine if they are consistent and, if not, what we should do about it. The good news is that I don't think we need to do anything. There are only a handful of link relations defined in HTML5 that are also defined in our vocabulary: alternate, bookmark, help, icon, license, next, prev, and stylesheet Each of these are defined in a consistent way. The language is not identical. We can make [1] have language closer to that in [2] if anyone thinks it is important, but at this point my recommendation is that we leave it alone. Let [2] stabilize then decide if we need to make any minor edits. [1] http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#linkTypes -- Shane McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. +1 763 786 8160 x120
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 20:02:31 UTC