- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 02:22:34 -0400
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Oct 23, 2011, at 9:37 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > There is a fairly lengthy conversation going on in the public-vocabs > mailing list about RDFa. Most notably, Google is submitting bugs via > that mailing list: > > RDFa Lite proposal: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2011Oct/0093.html > > RDFa Lite as W3C Note or W3C REC: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2011Oct/0111.html > > @itemref issues: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2011Oct/0096.html > > @property/@rel authoring issues: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2011Oct/0113.html Note this conversation is moving to the HTML Data TF mailing list, where syntax issues really belong. Here are a couple of my posts: HTML+RDFa specific @property rules: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-data-tf/2011Oct/0218.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-data-tf/2011Oct/0225.html Gregg > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Standardizing Payment Links - Why Online Tipping has Failed > http://manu.sporny.org/2011/payment-links/ >
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 06:23:31 UTC