Re: Support for integration with XML is broken

Never mind.... that restriction is in the generic XML+RDFa case.  And I 
don't believe our suggested resolution will address your concern.  I am 
pondering.

On 10/20/2011 10:18 AM, Shane McCarron wrote:
> Actually, I just noticed something Henry.  RDFa Core does NOT say this:
>
> On 10/19/2011 8:44 AM, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>>   The document must use the attributes defined in this specification in
>>   'no namespace'.
>
> It says this:
>
>   * If the Host Language uses XML Namespaces [XML-NAMES
>     <http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/Overview-src.html#bib-XML-NAMES>],
>     the attributes in this specification/should/be defined in 'no
>     namespace'. (e.g., when the attributes are used on elements in the
>     Host Language's namespace, they can be used with no qualifying
>     prefix:|<myml:myElement property="next">|).
>
>
> Note the SHOULD.  We today agreed to add a sentence to clarify that if 
> a host language decides to go the other way, then the RDFa attributes 
> must be qualified using the XHTML namespace.
>
> I feel like that addresses your concern.  Do you?
>
>
> -- 
> Shane McCarron
> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
> +1 763 786 8160 x120

-- 
Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
+1 763 786 8160 x120