Friday, 29 April 2011
- Re: First sketch of the new RDF-API
- Re: First sketch of the new RDF-API
- Re: First sketch of the new RDF-API
- Re: First sketch of the new RDF-API
- Re: First sketch of the new RDF-API
- Re: First sketch of the new RDF-API
- Re: First sketch of the new RDF-API
- Re: First sketch of the new RDF-API
- Re: Abstracts of each of the APIs
- First sketch of the new RDF-API
- Abstracts of each of the APIs
- Re: Issue on comparing BlankNodes in the RDF API
Thursday, 28 April 2011
- Re: Issue on comparing BlankNodes in the RDF API
- Re: Issue on comparing BlankNodes in the RDF API
- Re: Issue on comparing BlankNodes in the RDF API
- Re: Issue on comparing BlankNodes in the RDF API
- Re: Issue on comparing BlankNodes in the RDF API
- RDF Web Apps WG telecon minutes for 2011-04-28
- Issue on comparing BlankNodes in the RDF API
- Re: Telecon Agenda - April 28th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda - April 28th 2011, 1400 UTC
Wednesday, 27 April 2011
- Re: primary use case of the RDF API (ISSUE-91)
- Re: primary use case of the RDF API (ISSUE-91)
- ISSUE-94 (fragid-2): Formulation on fragid in RDFa Core [2nd LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
Tuesday, 26 April 2011
Sunday, 24 April 2011
- Re: RDF API updates
- Re: RDF API updates
- Re: RDF API updates
- Re: RDF API updates
- Re: RDF API updates
- Re: RDF API updates
- Re: RDF API updates
- Re: RDF API updates
- Re: RDF API updates
Saturday, 23 April 2011
Friday, 22 April 2011
- RDF API updates
- Re: Was GraphLiteral, now?
- Re: primary use case of the RDF API (ISSUE-91)
- Re: Was GraphLiteral, now?
- Was GraphLiteral, now?
- Re: primary use case of the RDF API (ISSUE-91)
- Re: primary use case of the RDF API (ISSUE-91)
- Re: ISSUE-93: Should the RDF API support persistent storage?
- Re: feedback from an RDF API implementation
- Re: API changes - was Re: feedback from an RDF API implementation
Thursday, 21 April 2011
- Re: ISSUE-91, ISSUE-92: Should the RDF API have a query() that is capable to send SPARQL requests to remote endpoints
- Re: ISSUE-93: Should the RDF API support persistent storage?
- API changes - was Re: feedback from an RDF API implementation
- Re: primary use case of the RDF API
- feedback from an RDF API implementation
- Re: primary use case of the RDF API
- Re: primary use case of the RDF API
- primary use case of the RDF API
- Re: ISSUE-93: Should the RDF API support persistent storage?
- Re: ISSUE-91: Should the RDF API have a query() mechanism that is capable of loading remote documents.
- Re: ISSUE-91, ISSUE-92: Should the RDF API have a query() that is capable to send SPARQL requests to remote endpoints
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-04-21
- RDFa Core last call comments - "have not yet caught up"
- Re: F2F meeting?
- Re: F2F meeting?
- Re: ISSUE-91: Should the RDF API have a query() mechanism that is capable of loading remote documents.
- Re: ISSUE-92: Should the RDF API support SPARQL?
- Re: ISSUE-93: Should the RDF API support persistent storage?
- F2F meeting?
- ISSUE-93: Should the RDF API support persistent storage?
- ISSUE-92: Should the RDF API support SPARQL?
- ISSUE-91: Should the RDF API have a query() mechanism that is capable of loading remote documents.
- Re: Is this something for the primer?
- Encoding test (Re: Is this something for the primer?)
Wednesday, 20 April 2011
- Re: Is this something for the primer?
- Re: Is this something for the primer?
- Re: Is this something for the primer?
- [Fwd: An RDFa annotation bookmarklet (research project)]
- RE: Is this something for the primer?
- Re: Is this something for the primer?
- Re: Is this something for the primer?
- Is this something for the primer?
Tuesday, 19 April 2011
- Re: RDFa API example in the RDFa Primer
- Telecon Agenda - April 21st 2011, 1400 UTC
- ISSUE-90 (CURIE collisions): CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions [2nd LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
Monday, 18 April 2011
- Re: RDFa API example in the RDFa Primer
- Re: Latest changes introducing the RDF API
- Re: Latest changes introducing the RDF API
- Re: Latest changes introducing the RDF API
- Re: Latest changes introducing the RDF API
- Re: Latest changes introducing the RDF API
- Re: Latest changes introducing the RDF API
- Re: Latest changes introducing the RDF API
Saturday, 16 April 2011
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: RDFa API example in the RDFa Primer
- Re: RDFa API example in the RDFa Primer
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: Latest changes introducing the RDF API
- Re: RDFa API example in the RDFa Primer
Friday, 15 April 2011
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- RDFa API example in the RDFa Primer
- Latest changes introducing the RDF API
- Re: Changes on the RDF API
- Changes on the RDF API
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: API musings....
- Re: ISSUE-88: Figure out a way to denote old Working Drafts as "OUTDATED" and place a big warning on the old drafts.
- Re: ISSUE-89: Decide what word we want to use to refer to the concept of RDFa terms - 'term' or 'alias'
- Re: ISSUE-89: Decide what word we want to use to refer to the concept of RDFa terms - 'term' or 'alias'
Thursday, 14 April 2011
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-04-14
- Re: ISSUE-88: Figure out a way to denote old Working Drafts as "OUTDATED" and place a big warning on the old drafts.
- ISSUE-89: Decide what word we want to use to refer to the concept of RDFa terms - 'term' or 'alias'
- ISSUE-88: Figure out a way to denote old Working Drafts as "OUTDATED" and place a big warning on the old drafts.
- Fwd: Re: Telecon Agenda - April 14th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Fwd: Re: Telecon Agenda - April 14th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Re: RDF Resource
- RDF Resource
- Re: Telecon Agenda - April 14th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Re: API musings....
- Reflections on the RDFa API
- Re: API musings....
- Re: API musings....
- Re: API musings....
- API musings....
- Re: Telecon Agenda - April 14th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Re: PROPOSAL: Publish RDFa Primer and RDFa API Working Drafts
- Telecon Agenda - April 14th 2011, 1400 UTC
Wednesday, 13 April 2011
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
Tuesday, 12 April 2011
- Fwd: Re: PROPOSAL: Publish RDFa Primer and RDFa API Working Drafts
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: RDFa Primer update
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
Monday, 11 April 2011
- CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: PROPOSAL: Publish RDFa Primer and RDFa API Working Drafts
- Re: RDFa Primer update
Sunday, 10 April 2011
- PROPOSAL: Publish RDFa Primer and RDFa API Working Drafts
- New RDF API Working Draft-ready document
- Re: New Editor's Draft for RDFa API
- RDFa Primer update
- RE: Primer update
Friday, 8 April 2011
- Re: Comments on the current version of the RDFa Primer
- Re: Comments on the current version of the RDFa Primer
- Re: Primer update
- Comments on the current version of the RDFa Primer
Thursday, 7 April 2011
Wednesday, 6 April 2011
- Re: Primer update
- Re: Wrong syntax in manifest.ttl of RDFa 1.1 test sute?
- Wrong syntax in manifest.ttl of RDFa 1.1 test sute?
- Re: Telecon Agenda - April 7th 2011, 1400 UTC
- RE: Primer update
- Primer update
- Re: comments re ISSUE-86 (prefixes and terms)
- comments re ISSUE-86 (prefixes and terms)
- [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD
Tuesday, 5 April 2011
- Re: XHTML+RDFa 1.1 'the most recent version'...
- Re: RDFa discovery?
- Re: RDFa discovery?
- Re: RDFa discovery?
- Re: RDFa discovery?
- RDFa discovery?
- Re: XHTML+RDFa 1.1 'the most recent version'...
- Telecon Agenda - April 7th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Telecon Agenda - April 8th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Re: XHTML+RDFa 1.1 'the most recent version'...
- IRI Whitespace?
Monday, 4 April 2011
Tuesday, 29 March 2011
Monday, 4 April 2011
- Re: RDFa API thoughts
- Re: Updated RDFa API spec
- Re: New Editor's Draft for RDFa API
- New Editor's Draft for RDFa API