- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:24:02 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, RDFA Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hi All, Ivan, I'm editing the RDF API document at the minute, and trying to come up with a non offensive but still descriptive name for what was previously called GraphLiteral. Would you be prepared to allow the usage of any of the following: - QuotedGraph - TripleSet - EmbeddedGraph I understand the hesitance to use GraphLiteral, but I'm also hesitant to use G-Box since it's starting to take on new meaning in the RDF WG to refer to a named set of triples which change over time (a Named-G-Box) rather than anonymous "triple container" as was originally intended - thus it could easily end up just being another IRI, or having a required name, both of which are different to this more general concept which is basically just allowing a Graph to sit in one of the triple slots. Best, Nathan
Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 15:25:08 UTC