- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:40:17 +0100
- To: RDF Web Applications Working Group WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > ISSUE-92: Should the RDF API support SPARQL? > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/92 This issue can be split in 3: 1) Should the RDF API require support for remote sparql accessed via say http? (and provide convenience methods) 2) Should the RDF API require support for local sparql? (and provide convenience methods) 3) Should the RDF API consider interface usage by SPARQL implementations, such that a SPARQL implementation could easily be built on top of RDF API interface modules developed by third parties? (and ensure support for generalized triples) (from previous discussions 1&2 were deemed to be out of scope, as in some other wg or a note could define these at some point as extensions to the API, and that 3 would be wise). Best, Nahan
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 15:41:25 UTC