- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:15:44 +0100
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Manu Sporny : > Hi Olaf, > > I'll try to take a shot at answering your questions... > .... > > Does all of that make sense? > Yes, for authors this basically means to ensure to have a well defined document, add the version information. And if other circumstances prevent an author from adding version information, the author has to take into account, that the meaning of the document is or can become plurivalent. I had similar conclusions for other formats like SVG, therefore in a tutorial (SVG, SVG tiny 1.2 can contain RDFa too) I recommended already to add always version information, if the document is more than just decorative to conserve at least the intended meaning, whatever the current interpretation of a specific viewer/processor is. Just because I mentioned already SVG and I have another format using RDFa as well - how to indicate the intended RDFa version in other (XML) formats than XHTML? Olaf
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2011 08:23:52 UTC