- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:31:14 -0400
- To: "nathan@webr3.org" <nathan@webr3.org>
- CC: RDFA Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
The ongoing discussion on SWI [1] on the use of site maps and VoiD seems just as relevant for RDFa as any other RDF format. Gregg Kellogg [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2011Apr/0003.html Sent from my iPad On Apr 5, 2011, at 6:14 AM, "Nathan" <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > Just a quick question, how does one tell whether an document contains, > or does not contain, RDFa? > > Let's suppose I have an archive of 10k documents, I'd like to extract > the RDFa on them, how can tell upfront that they contain RDFa, without > having to process them all? > > a: I may have already asked this previously! > > b: This may be irrelevant for non-SAX based parsers (supposing that the > bulk of the weight would be in syntax->DOM conversion, a step needed > before any "this is RDFa flag" could be detected). > > Unsure whether this is even worth asking now.. > > Best, > > Nathan >
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2011 15:34:17 UTC