public-qt-comments@w3.org from April 2004 by date

Friday, 30 April 2004

• [XSLT2.0] XML Schema WG Comment 1/2 [datatypes namespace] Michael Kay
• Re: [XSLT2.0] Binding of a local xsl:variable or xsl:param by another local xsl:variable/xsl:param, Michael Kay
• RE: questionable syntax choices Michael Kay
• RE: questionable syntax choices Volkmann, Mark
• RE: [XPath 2.0] XPath 1.0 Compatibility Mode doesn't cover fn:number Priscilla Walmsley
• RE: [XPath 2.0] XPath 1.0 Compatibility Mode doesn't cover fn:number Michael Kay
• Re: [XPath 2.0] XPath 1.0 Compatibility Mode doesn't cover fn:number Don Chamberlin

Thursday, 29 April 2004

• [XQuery] MS-XQ-LC1-056 Don Chamberlin
• RE: questionable syntax choices Michael Kay
• RE: questionable syntax choices Volkmann, Mark
• Re: questionable syntax choices Jim Melton
• Re: questionable syntax choices Jonathan Robie
• Re: [XQuery] semicolon separator after declarations Jonathan Robie
• Re: Last Call comments on XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language XSCH-QL-002 Don Chamberlin
• Re: [XSLT2.0] Consistent Rules on Import Precedence Igor Hersht
• Re: [XSLT2.0] Consistent Rules on Import Precedence Michael Kay

Wednesday, 28 April 2004

• XML Schema WG comments on XPath 2.0 Don Chamberlin
• Re: [Serialization] IBM-SE-008: Serializing namespace nodes Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serial] canonicalization Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serialization] SCHEMA-B Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serialization] SCHEMA-C Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments Henry Zongaro

Tuesday, 27 April 2004

• xquery 1.0 and xpath 2.0 data model Mabry, F. DR EECS

Monday, 26 April 2004

• RE: questionable syntax choices Michael Kay
• RE: questionable syntax choices Volkmann, Mark
• Re: questionable syntax choices Jonathan Robie
• RE: [XQuery] semicolon separator after declarations Michael Kay
• Re: questionable syntax choices scott_boag@us.ibm.com
• Re: [XQuery] semicolon separator after declarations Xavier Franc
• Re: Request to remove unnecessary semicolons Jonathan Robie
• Re: [XQuery] semicolon separator after declarations Jonathan Robie

Thursday, 22 April 2004

• [XSLT 2.0] IBM-XSLT-129: Default function namespace for function-available Henry Zongaro
• [XSLT 2.0] IBM-XSLT-128: behaviour of self::node() if there is no context node Henry Zongaro
• RE: Request to remove unnecessary semicolons Michael Kay

Wednesday, 21 April 2004

• Request to remove unnecessary semicolons Jason Hunter
• [FS] 4.1.5 Function Calls: eval of imported function Michael Dyck
• [XQuery] semicolon separator after declarations Xavier Franc
• [FS] overlap in Formal and Core symbols Michael Dyck

Tuesday, 20 April 2004

• [FS] A few comments on formal semantics Vladimir Gapeyev
• RE: FW: XSLT 2.0: XML Output Method: the omit-xml-declaration Parameter Henry Zongaro
• RE: ORA-FO-336-B: Which collations support collation units? Ashok Malhotra
• Re: typing of integer operations in Xpath2 David Carlisle
• RE: typing of integer operations in Xpath2 Michael Kay
• RE: FW: XSLT 2.0: XML Output Method: the omit-xml-declaration Parameter Michael Kay
• typing of integer operations in Xpath2 David Carlisle
• RE: FW: XSLT 2.0: XML Output Method: the omit-xml-declaration Parameter Deborah Cawkwell
• RE: questionable syntax choices Michael Kay

Monday, 19 April 2004

• RE: questionable syntax choices Volkmann, Mark
• RE: questionable syntax choices Michael Rys
• questionable syntax choices Volkmann, Mark
• RE: [F&O] LQ-FO-03 - extended access to URI resolver Ashok Malhotra
• RE: [F&O] LQ-FO-001 - random numbers Ashok Malhotra
• RE: [F&O] LQ-FO-002 - file exists Ashok Malhotra

Saturday, 17 April 2004

• [FS] lots of comments on the Formal Semantics Michael Dyck
• Re: [XSLT2.0] variable preceding sort in for-each Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: [XSLT2.0] variable preceding sort in for-each Michael Kay

Friday, 16 April 2004

• [XSLT2.0] variable preceding sort in for-each Bjoern Hoehrmann
• [FS] Normalization of Quantified expression Lionel Villard
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-056 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-055 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-053 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-048 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-045 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-047 Michael Rys
• [FS] Editorial comments on section 3 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-044 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-036 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-039 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-028 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-026 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-027 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-018 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-024 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-017 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-021 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-011 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-016 Michael Rys
• [FS] Editorial comments on section 2 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-002 Michael Rys
• [FS] Editorial comments on section 1 (MS-FS-LC1-001) Michael Rys
• RE: Microsoft's Formal Semantics review Michael Rys
• Microsoft's Formal Semantics review Michael Rys
• ORA-FS-004-E: Formal Semantics comments, precise types Stephen Buxton
• ORA-FS-003-E: Formal Semantics comments, bugs Stephen Buxton
• ORA-FS-002-E: Formal Semantics comments, clarification Stephen Buxton
• ORA-FS-001-E: Formal Semantics comments, editorial Stephen Buxton

Thursday, 15 April 2004

• RE: [XQuery] MS-XQ-LC1-041 Michael Rys
• Re: [XQuery] MS-XQ-LC1-041 Michael Rys
• [FS] lots of comments on the Formal Semantics Michael Dyck

Wednesday, 14 April 2004

• Re: ORA-XQ-410-B: nested sequences Norman Walsh

Tuesday, 13 April 2004

• Re: NM-DM-3: CDATA support in Data Mode Liam Quin
• RE: [Serialization] SCHEMA-I Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments Henry Zongaro
• RE: [Serialization] SCHEMA-I Michael Kay
• [XQuery] fs:convert-operand / General comparison Kirmse, Daniel
• Re: FW: XSLT 2.0: XML Output Method: the omit-xml-declaration Parameter Henry Zongaro
• Understanding General Comparison as described in XQuery Formal Se mantics section 4.5.2 Kirmse, Daniel
• Re: ORA-SE-326-B: XML declaration is mandatory if the version is not 1.0 Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serialization] IBM-SE-011: Character expansion Henry Zongaro
• Re: ORA-SE-315-Q: How can character expansion create new nodes? Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serialization] SCHEMA-H Henry Zongaro
• Re: ORA-SE-312-B: Missing exception for additional whitespace added by indent parameter Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serialization] SCHEMA-I Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serialization] IBM-SE-014: Serializing the "nilled" property Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serialization] IBM-SE-009: Discarding of type annotations Henry Zongaro

Saturday, 10 April 2004

• RE: [XPath] Range of legal values of a timezone Ashok Malhotra
• RE: [XPath] Range of legal values of a timezone Ashok Malhotra
• [XPath] Range of legal values of a timezone Michael Kay

Friday, 9 April 2004

• Re: [F&O] IBM-FO-104: Description of substring matching should account for ignorable collations units Jim Melton
• RE: [XQuery] IBM-XQ-028 NaN Comparison Michael Kay
• [XQuery] IBM-XQ-028 NaN Comparison Andrew Eisenberg
• Re: [F&O] IBM-FO-104: Description of substring matching should account for ignorable collations units Michael Kay
• [XPath] implicit timezone Michael Kay

Thursday, 8 April 2004

• [XPath] Operand conversion in arithmetic expressions Michael Kay

Monday, 5 April 2004

• RE: Question about decimal arithmetic Michael Kay
• Re: Fw: [Serialization] IBM-SE-001: Documentization Don Chamberlin
• RE: Question about decimal arithmetic Michael Rys
• RE: Question about decimal arithmetic Michael Kay
• RE: Question about decimal arithmetic Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Question about decimal arithmetic Jeni Tennison
• Re: Question about decimal arithmetic Michael Kay

Saturday, 3 April 2004

• Re: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? Oliver Becker

Friday, 2 April 2004

• Re: [XSLT 2.0] unparsed-text() signature Jeni Tennison
• Re: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? Dimitre Novatchev
• Re: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? Jim Melton
• RE: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? Michael Kay
• Re: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? Dimitre Novatchev
• Re: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? Oliver Becker
• Re: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? Dimitre Novatchev

Thursday, 1 April 2004

• Re: XML Schema WG comments on Data Model Norman Walsh
• Re: [DM] MS-DM-LC2-037 Norman Walsh
• Re: Fw: [XSLT2.0] Igor Hersht
• [XSLT 2.0] Union operator in patterns Michael Kay
• [XSLT 2.0] unparsed-text() signature Michael Kay
• Re: [XSLT2] OB06 xsl:analyze-string Michael Kay
• Re: [DM] MS-DM-LC2-050 Norman Walsh
• Re: [DM] MS-DM-LC2-056 Norman Walsh
• Re: [DM] MS-DM-LC2-061 Norman Walsh
• Re: IBM-DM-029: Appendices E, F, and G are redundant Norman Walsh
• [FS] IBM-FS-107: Wrong types for arguments of fn:subsequence Henry Zongaro
• [FS] IBM-FS-106: Quantifier of inferred type of fn:remove Henry Zongaro
• [FS] IBM-FS-105: Inferred type of fn:sum with one argument Henry Zongaro
• [FS] IBM-FS-104: fn:min, fn:max need to accept date/time arguments Henry Zongaro
• [FS] IBM-FS-103: Normalization for unary arithmetic affects negative zero Henry Zongaro
• [FS] IBM-FS-102: fs prefix does not refer to a namespace Henry Zongaro
• [FS] IBM-FS-101: Logical separation of phases Henry Zongaro
• [FS] IBM-FS-100: Significance of order of premises in inference rules Henry Zongaro
• Re: XML Schema WG comments on Data Model Norman Walsh
• Re: ORA-DM-218-E: In-line definitions easy to miss Norman Walsh
• Re: [DM] IBM-DM-109: Data model editorial comments Norman Walsh
• Fw: [XSLT2.0] Henry Zongaro
• RE: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? Michael Kay
• RE: http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#initiating Michael Kay
• [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#initiating David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk

Last message date: Friday, 30 April 2004 18:54:25 UTC