public-qt-comments@w3.org from April 2004 by author

Andrew Eisenberg

• [XQuery] IBM-XQ-028 NaN Comparison (Friday, 9 April)

Ashok Malhotra

• RE: ORA-FO-336-B: Which collations support collation units? (Tuesday, 20 April)
• RE: [F&O] LQ-FO-03 - extended access to URI resolver (Monday, 19 April)
• RE: [F&O] LQ-FO-001 - random numbers (Monday, 19 April)
• RE: [F&O] LQ-FO-002 - file exists (Monday, 19 April)
• RE: [XPath] Range of legal values of a timezone (Saturday, 10 April)
• RE: [XPath] Range of legal values of a timezone (Saturday, 10 April)
• RE: Question about decimal arithmetic (Monday, 5 April)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: [XSLT2.0] variable preceding sort in for-each (Saturday, 17 April)
• [XSLT2.0] variable preceding sort in for-each (Friday, 16 April)

David Carlisle

• Re: typing of integer operations in Xpath2 (Tuesday, 20 April)
• typing of integer operations in Xpath2 (Tuesday, 20 April)

David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk

• http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#initiating (Thursday, 1 April)

Deborah Cawkwell

• RE: FW: XSLT 2.0: XML Output Method: the omit-xml-declaration Parameter (Tuesday, 20 April)

Dimitre Novatchev

• Re: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? (Friday, 2 April)
• Re: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? (Friday, 2 April)
• Re: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? (Friday, 2 April)

Don Chamberlin

• Re: [XPath 2.0] XPath 1.0 Compatibility Mode doesn't cover fn:number (Friday, 30 April)
• [XQuery] MS-XQ-LC1-056 (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: Last Call comments on XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language XSCH-QL-002 (Thursday, 29 April)
• XML Schema WG comments on XPath 2.0 (Wednesday, 28 April)
• Re: Fw: [Serialization] IBM-SE-001: Documentization (Monday, 5 April)

Henry Zongaro

• Re: [Serialization] IBM-SE-008: Serializing namespace nodes (Wednesday, 28 April)
• Re: [Serial] canonicalization (Wednesday, 28 April)
• Re: [Serialization] SCHEMA-B (Wednesday, 28 April)
• Re: [Serialization] SCHEMA-C (Wednesday, 28 April)
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments (Wednesday, 28 April)
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments (Wednesday, 28 April)
• [XSLT 2.0] IBM-XSLT-129: Default function namespace for function-available (Thursday, 22 April)
• [XSLT 2.0] IBM-XSLT-128: behaviour of self::node() if there is no context node (Thursday, 22 April)
• RE: FW: XSLT 2.0: XML Output Method: the omit-xml-declaration Parameter (Tuesday, 20 April)
• RE: [Serialization] SCHEMA-I (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: FW: XSLT 2.0: XML Output Method: the omit-xml-declaration Parameter (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: ORA-SE-326-B: XML declaration is mandatory if the version is not 1.0 (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: [Serialization] IBM-SE-011: Character expansion (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: [Serialization] SCHEMA-H (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: ORA-SE-315-Q: How can character expansion create new nodes? (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: ORA-SE-312-B: Missing exception for additional whitespace added by indent parameter (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: [Serialization] SCHEMA-I (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: [Serialization] IBM-SE-014: Serializing the "nilled" property (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Re: [Serialization] IBM-SE-009: Discarding of type annotations (Tuesday, 13 April)
• [FS] IBM-FS-107: Wrong types for arguments of fn:subsequence (Thursday, 1 April)
• [FS] IBM-FS-106: Quantifier of inferred type of fn:remove (Thursday, 1 April)
• [FS] IBM-FS-105: Inferred type of fn:sum with one argument (Thursday, 1 April)
• [FS] IBM-FS-104: fn:min, fn:max need to accept date/time arguments (Thursday, 1 April)
• [FS] IBM-FS-103: Normalization for unary arithmetic affects negative zero (Thursday, 1 April)
• [FS] IBM-FS-102: fs prefix does not refer to a namespace (Thursday, 1 April)
• [FS] IBM-FS-101: Logical separation of phases (Thursday, 1 April)
• [FS] IBM-FS-100: Significance of order of premises in inference rules (Thursday, 1 April)
• Fw: [XSLT2.0] (Thursday, 1 April)

Igor Hersht

• Re: [XSLT2.0] Consistent Rules on Import Precedence (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: Fw: [XSLT2.0] (Thursday, 1 April)

Jason Hunter

• Request to remove unnecessary semicolons (Wednesday, 21 April)

Jeni Tennison

• Re: Question about decimal arithmetic (Monday, 5 April)
• Re: [XSLT 2.0] unparsed-text() signature (Friday, 2 April)

Jim Melton

• Re: questionable syntax choices (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: [F&O] IBM-FO-104: Description of substring matching should account for ignorable collations units (Friday, 9 April)
• Re: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? (Friday, 2 April)

Jonathan Robie

• Re: questionable syntax choices (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: [XQuery] semicolon separator after declarations (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: questionable syntax choices (Monday, 26 April)
• Re: Request to remove unnecessary semicolons (Monday, 26 April)
• Re: [XQuery] semicolon separator after declarations (Monday, 26 April)

Kirmse, Daniel

• [XQuery] fs:convert-operand / General comparison (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Understanding General Comparison as described in XQuery Formal Se mantics section 4.5.2 (Tuesday, 13 April)

Liam Quin

• Re: NM-DM-3: CDATA support in Data Mode (Tuesday, 13 April)

Lionel Villard

• [FS] Normalization of Quantified expression (Friday, 16 April)

Mabry, F. DR EECS

• xquery 1.0 and xpath 2.0 data model (Tuesday, 27 April)

Michael Dyck

• [FS] 4.1.5 Function Calls: eval of imported function (Wednesday, 21 April)
• [FS] overlap in Formal and Core symbols (Wednesday, 21 April)
• [FS] lots of comments on the Formal Semantics (Saturday, 17 April)
• [FS] lots of comments on the Formal Semantics (Thursday, 15 April)

Michael Kay

• [XSLT2.0] XML Schema WG Comment 1/2 [datatypes namespace] (Friday, 30 April)
• Re: [XSLT2.0] Binding of a local xsl:variable or xsl:param by another local xsl:variable/xsl:param, (Friday, 30 April)
• RE: questionable syntax choices (Friday, 30 April)
• RE: [XPath 2.0] XPath 1.0 Compatibility Mode doesn't cover fn:number (Friday, 30 April)
• RE: questionable syntax choices (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: [XSLT2.0] Consistent Rules on Import Precedence (Thursday, 29 April)
• RE: questionable syntax choices (Monday, 26 April)
• RE: [XQuery] semicolon separator after declarations (Monday, 26 April)
• RE: Request to remove unnecessary semicolons (Thursday, 22 April)
• RE: typing of integer operations in Xpath2 (Tuesday, 20 April)
• RE: FW: XSLT 2.0: XML Output Method: the omit-xml-declaration Parameter (Tuesday, 20 April)
• RE: questionable syntax choices (Tuesday, 20 April)
• RE: [XSLT2.0] variable preceding sort in for-each (Saturday, 17 April)
• RE: [Serialization] SCHEMA-I (Tuesday, 13 April)
• [XPath] Range of legal values of a timezone (Saturday, 10 April)
• RE: [XQuery] IBM-XQ-028 NaN Comparison (Friday, 9 April)
• Re: [F&O] IBM-FO-104: Description of substring matching should account for ignorable collations units (Friday, 9 April)
• [XPath] implicit timezone (Friday, 9 April)
• [XPath] Operand conversion in arithmetic expressions (Thursday, 8 April)
• RE: Question about decimal arithmetic (Monday, 5 April)
• RE: Question about decimal arithmetic (Monday, 5 April)
• Re: Question about decimal arithmetic (Monday, 5 April)
• RE: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? (Friday, 2 April)
• [XSLT 2.0] Union operator in patterns (Thursday, 1 April)
• [XSLT 2.0] unparsed-text() signature (Thursday, 1 April)
• Re: [XSLT2] OB06 xsl:analyze-string (Thursday, 1 April)
• RE: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? (Thursday, 1 April)
• RE: http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#initiating (Thursday, 1 April)

Michael Rys

• RE: questionable syntax choices (Monday, 19 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-056 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-055 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-028 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-053 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-048 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-045 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-047 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] Editorial comments on section 3 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-044 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-036 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-039 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-026 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-027 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-017 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-018 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-024 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-021 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-002 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-011 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-016 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] Editorial comments on section 2 (Friday, 16 April)
• [FS] Editorial comments on section 1 (MS-FS-LC1-001) (Friday, 16 April)
• RE: Microsoft's Formal Semantics review (Friday, 16 April)
• Microsoft's Formal Semantics review (Friday, 16 April)
• RE: [XQuery] MS-XQ-LC1-041 (Thursday, 15 April)
• Re: [XQuery] MS-XQ-LC1-041 (Thursday, 15 April)
• RE: Question about decimal arithmetic (Monday, 5 April)

Norman Walsh

• Re: ORA-XQ-410-B: nested sequences (Wednesday, 14 April)
• Re: XML Schema WG comments on Data Model (Thursday, 1 April)
• Re: [DM] MS-DM-LC2-037 (Thursday, 1 April)
• Re: [DM] MS-DM-LC2-050 (Thursday, 1 April)
• Re: [DM] MS-DM-LC2-056 (Thursday, 1 April)
• Re: [DM] MS-DM-LC2-061 (Thursday, 1 April)
• Re: IBM-DM-029: Appendices E, F, and G are redundant (Thursday, 1 April)
• Re: XML Schema WG comments on Data Model (Thursday, 1 April)
• Re: ORA-DM-218-E: In-line definitions easy to miss (Thursday, 1 April)
• Re: [DM] IBM-DM-109: Data model editorial comments (Thursday, 1 April)

Oliver Becker

• Re: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? (Saturday, 3 April)
• Re: [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? (Friday, 2 April)

Priscilla Walmsley

• RE: [XPath 2.0] XPath 1.0 Compatibility Mode doesn't cover fn:number (Friday, 30 April)

scott_boag@us.ibm.com

• Re: questionable syntax choices (Monday, 26 April)

Stephen Buxton

• ORA-FS-001-E: Formal Semantics comments, editorial (Friday, 16 April)
• ORA-FS-004-E: Formal Semantics comments, precise types (Friday, 16 April)
• ORA-FS-003-E: Formal Semantics comments, bugs (Friday, 16 April)
• ORA-FS-002-E: Formal Semantics comments, clarification (Friday, 16 April)

Svgdeveloper@aol.com

• [XSLT 2.0] Why doesn't XSLT have an <xsl:else> element? (Thursday, 1 April)

Vladimir Gapeyev

• [FS] A few comments on formal semantics (Tuesday, 20 April)

Volkmann, Mark

• RE: questionable syntax choices (Friday, 30 April)
• RE: questionable syntax choices (Thursday, 29 April)
• RE: questionable syntax choices (Monday, 26 April)
• RE: questionable syntax choices (Monday, 19 April)
• questionable syntax choices (Monday, 19 April)

Xavier Franc

• Re: [XQuery] semicolon separator after declarations (Monday, 26 April)
• [XQuery] semicolon separator after declarations (Wednesday, 21 April)

Last message date: Friday, 30 April 2004 18:54:25 UTC