RE: Microsoft's Formal Semantics review

Also note that we are not going to repeat several major feature comments
regarding semantics that we would like to have changed, removed, made
optional or trimmed down (such as removal of fn:collection and implicit
validation on construction or changes to the validation semantics).

Best regards
Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Rys
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 12:08 AM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Microsoft's Formal Semantics review
> 
> The following mails will contain the first of Microsoft's comments on
the
> Formal Semantics Last Call document. Due to the size of the document
and
> other time constraints on the reviewer, we have not finished the
document
> review yet. We assume that it will take us into May until we have
finished
> it. The final comment will note this.
> 
> Unlike in previous reviews, where we sent one comment by email, we
will
> send multiple editorial comments per mail and will only send
individual
> mail for not purely editorial comments. Every comment will be numbered
> with a number starting with MS-FS-LC1-.
> 
> Tonight, we will send out our comments on the first 3 sections.
> 
> Enjoy
> Michael

Received on Friday, 16 April 2004 04:05:57 UTC