W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > April 2004

RE: questionable syntax choices

From: Volkmann, Mark <Mark.Volkmann@AGEDWARDS.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:22:36 -0500
Message-Id: <89539780CB9BD51182270002A5897DF60C02292E@hqempn04.agedwards.com>
To: 'Jonathan Robie' <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>, scott_boag@us.ibm.com
Cc: "'public-qt-comments@w3.org'" <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@datadirect.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 12:06 PM
> To: scott_boag@us.ibm.com
> Cc: Volkmann, Mark; 'public-qt-comments@w3.org'
> Subject: Re: questionable syntax choices
> Personally, I will be encouraging the Working Group not to 
> spend a lot 
> of time on the concrete syntax of comments. We have to stop 
> spending so 
> much time on minor issues.

Of the three items I originally commented on in this thread, I think the
semicolon issue is the most important.  I don't think a semicolon should
ever be required after a block that is already delimited by curly braces.
I'd guess it will be hard to make the case that including the semicolon
makes writing XQuery parsers significantly easier.

A.G. Edwards & Sons' outgoing and incoming e-mails are electronically
archived and subject to review and/or disclosure to someone other 
than the recipient.

Received on Thursday, 29 April 2004 16:11:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:56 UTC