- From: Oliver Becker <obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 16:02:15 +0200 (MEST)
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org, dnovatchev@yahoo.com
> > Is there a good reason for the absence of <xsl:else>? > > Yes and you could have tried to think about it. How would you solve the > "dangling else" problem? Dimitre, since the W3C doesn't want to add xsl:else, this discussion might be pointless. However: requiring that xsl:else must always follow immediately an xsl:if is IMHO not more complicate than requiring that xsl:param must always come first within a template. Moreover, there is no dangling else here: if x then (if y then a else b) becomes <xsl:if test="x"> <xsl:if test="y">a</xsl:if> <xsl:else>b</xsl:else> </xsl:if> if x then (if y then a) else b becomes <xsl:if test="x"> <xsl:if test="y">a</xsl:if> </xsl:if> <xsl:else>b</xsl:else> Regards, Oliver Becker /-------------------------------------------------------------------\ | ob|do Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker | | --+-- E-Mail: obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de | | op|qo WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker | \-------------------------------------------------------------------/
Received on Friday, 2 April 2004 09:02:36 UTC