- From: Oliver Becker <obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 16:02:15 +0200 (MEST)
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org, dnovatchev@yahoo.com
> > Is there a good reason for the absence of <xsl:else>?
>
> Yes and you could have tried to think about it. How would you solve the
> "dangling else" problem?
Dimitre,
since the W3C doesn't want to add xsl:else, this discussion might be
pointless. However: requiring that xsl:else must always follow immediately
an xsl:if is IMHO not more complicate than requiring that xsl:param must
always come first within a template.
Moreover, there is no dangling else here:
if x then (if y then a else b)
becomes
<xsl:if test="x">
<xsl:if test="y">a</xsl:if>
<xsl:else>b</xsl:else>
</xsl:if>
if x then (if y then a) else b
becomes
<xsl:if test="x">
<xsl:if test="y">a</xsl:if>
</xsl:if>
<xsl:else>b</xsl:else>
Regards,
Oliver Becker
/-------------------------------------------------------------------\
| ob|do Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker |
| --+-- E-Mail: obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de |
| op|qo WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker |
\-------------------------------------------------------------------/
Received on Friday, 2 April 2004 09:02:36 UTC