?$B%!?(B2.1.3 IRI/URI Canonicalization does not address IRIs with IDNs
Another semantics question
Comments on new version of primer
Exceptions to a label's normal rules
Formalisation of OWL semantics (was Re: String Matching -> Reg Ex is not always easy)
HTTP Link discussion
In support of draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01
IRI set tester
meta-DRs abd grouping by resource property
New version of primer
POWDER formalisms
POWDER Formalisms 2 - this time with promised addendum
Report on Beijing
Semantics question (was Re: XSLT question)
- Stasinos Konstantopoulos (Wednesday, 23 April)
- Phil Archer (Wednesday, 23 April)
- Stasinos Konstantopoulos (Wednesday, 23 April)
- Phil Archer (Wednesday, 23 April)
- Stasinos Konstantopoulos (Wednesday, 23 April)
- Phil Archer (Wednesday, 23 April)
- Stasinos Konstantopoulos (Wednesday, 23 April)
- Stasinos Konstantopoulos (Wednesday, 23 April)
- Phil Archer (Tuesday, 22 April)
- Phil Archer (Tuesday, 22 April)
single include/exclude pair in vanilla POWDER/XML and POWDER-S
taglists et alia
The 'missing protocol part'?
Try again then (was Re: Semantics question (was Re: XSLT question))
XML question
XSLT for port splitting
XSLT question
§2.1.3 IRI/URI Canonicalization does not address IRIs with IDNs
ァ2.1.3 IRI/URI Canonicalization does not address IRIs with IDNs
Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2008 08:44:05 UTC