- From: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:25:26 +0100
- To: Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org>
Thank you. That makes life a lot easier (and explains why I can't find a ref to ref in my XML in 21 days book or the specs themselves) Big e-mail under construction here... P Smith, Kevin, VF-Group wrote: > In XML terms, ref is not a reserved attribute in the XML namespace (like > xml:id), so it is up to the schema's dialect to decide what datatype ref > takes. > > So in POWDER terms, our ref(s) can take a whitespace separated list of > URIs. > > Kevin (who wishes he was at the cinema :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-powderwg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-powderwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Phil Archer > Sent: 23 April 2008 11:16 > To: Public POWDER > Subject: XML question > > > As I continue to shine an Yttrium lamp* on my ignorance, can I ask - > does a ref attribute on an XML element take a single URI or can it take > a white space separated list?? > > Phil. > > * I learnt yesterday that the rare earth element Yttrium is used in > powerful projector lamps as used at cinemas and was keen to get it into > the conversation somehow. > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 10:26:23 UTC