public-poe-wg@w3.org from October 2016 by author

benedict.whittamsmith@thomsonreuters.com

• RE: [Minutes] 2016-10-24 Incl. *Time change next week* (Monday, 24 October)
• RE: [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (24 OCT 2016) (Monday, 24 October)

Caroline Boyd

• Re: [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (24 OCT 2016) (Monday, 24 October)

Ivan Herman

• The crazy 'qualified' idea:-) (Monday, 10 October)
• Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? (Sunday, 9 October)
• Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? (Saturday, 8 October)
• Re: Another approach to the non-reification problem... (Monday, 3 October)

Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken

• Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? (Friday, 14 October)
• Re: The crazy 'qualified' idea:-) (Friday, 14 October)
• Re: The crazy 'qualified' idea:-) (Thursday, 13 October)

Michael Steidl \(IPTC\)

• RE: [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (24 OCT 2016) (Monday, 24 October)

Myles, Stuart

• RE: [Minutes] 2016-10-24 Incl. *Time change next week* (Monday, 24 October)
• RE: ODRL XML Encoding (Tuesday, 18 October)
• RE: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? (Monday, 17 October)
• RE: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? (Friday, 14 October)
• RE: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? (Thursday, 13 October)
• RE: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? (Friday, 7 October)

Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker

• poe-ACTION-35: Write virtualf2f agenda (Monday, 31 October)
• poe-ACTION-34: Update ucr according to today's discussion (Monday, 3 October)
• poe-ACTION-33: Write to antoine asking for example that odrl can't handle (Monday, 3 October)
• poe-ACTION-32: Write to antoine as heads up for renato's mail (Monday, 3 October)

Phil Archer

• [Minutes] 2016-10-31 (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [Minutes] 2016-10-24 Incl. *Time change next week* (Monday, 24 October)
• [Minutes] 2016-10-24 Incl. *Time change next week* (Monday, 24 October)
• [Minutes][2016-10-17 (Monday, 17 October)
• [Minutes] 2016-10-10 (Monday, 10 October)
• Re: Save the date 5 December (was Re: Virtual F2F, choosing the date - pls complete the Doodle) (Wednesday, 5 October)
• Save the date 5 December (was Re: Virtual F2F, choosing the date - pls complete the Doodle) (Wednesday, 5 October)
• Re: poe-ACTION-33: Write to antoine asking for example that odrl can't handle (Tuesday, 4 October)
• Virtual F2F, choosing the date - pls complete the Doodle (Monday, 3 October)
• [Minutes] 2016-10-03 Minutes and more (Monday, 3 October)

Renato Iannella

• [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (31 OCT 2016) (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [Minutes] 2016-10-24 Incl. *Time change next week* (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Re: Reassessing applicability of (legacy) concepts (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Re: UC links? (Friday, 21 October)
• [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (24 OCT 2016) (Friday, 21 October)
• Closed Actions (Thursday, 20 October)
• TPAC/Reqs summary (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: BISG Use Cases (Thursday, 20 October)
• Duty Unit Constraint (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Resolution 23 (Wednesday, 19 October)
• BISG Use Cases (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Tracking Actions (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Minor ODRL update (Tuesday, 18 October)
• ODRL XML Encoding (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Scope in the ODRL Model (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? (Saturday, 15 October)
• Complex Constraints (Friday, 14 October)
• Extended Relations (Friday, 14 October)
• [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (17 OCT 2016) (Friday, 14 October)
• Re: The crazy 'qualified' idea:-) (Friday, 14 October)
• Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? (Friday, 14 October)
• Re: The crazy 'qualified' idea:-) (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? (Sunday, 9 October)
• Re: Status of POE.R.DM.09 "Complex Constraints" (Thursday, 6 October)
• Re: Status of POE.R.DM.06 "Support relative time constraints" (Thursday, 6 October)
• Re: Status of POE.R.V.08? (Thursday, 6 October)
• Re: Status of POE.R.V.03? (Thursday, 6 October)
• [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (10 OCT 2016) (Wednesday, 5 October)
• Re: Another approach to the non-reification problem... (Monday, 3 October)

Sabrina Kirrane

• Re: Reassessing applicability of (legacy) concepts (Monday, 31 October)

Simon Steyskal

• Reassessing applicability of (legacy) concepts (Monday, 24 October)
• Re: UC links? (Monday, 24 October)
• Re: UC links? (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: TPAC/Reqs summary (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: Resolution 23 (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Status of POE.R.DM.09 "Complex Constraints" (Thursday, 6 October)
• Status of POE.R.DM.06 "Support relative time constraints" (Thursday, 6 October)
• Status of POE.R.V.08? (Thursday, 6 October)
• Status of POE.R.V.03? (Thursday, 6 October)

Víctor Rodríguez Doncel

• Re: Duty Unit Constraint (Monday, 24 October)
• Re: [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (17 OCT 2016) (Monday, 17 October)
• Re: Save the date 5 December (was Re: Virtual F2F, choosing the date - pls complete the Doodle) (Wednesday, 5 October)

Xueyuan Jia

• Call for Exclusions (Update): ODRL Information Model; ODRL Vocabulary & Expression (Monday, 24 October)

Last message date: Monday, 31 October 2016 16:23:38 UTC