Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml?

> On 8 Oct. 2016, at 07:35, Myles, Stuart <SMyles@ap.org> wrote:
> 
> So far as I can see, this approach wouldn't require us to alter the properties that we've identified for ODRL in JSON, so long as there is a direct mapping to the ODRL ontology for each one.

I think the answer is “no” ;-)

Because the point (I think) of JSON-LD is that it uses the same property URIs as defined in the OWL Ontology.

So, for example, in the current JSON (only) encoding, we have defined the “permissions” property (where as the ontology only has “permission”)

Also (for example), the current JSON defines “assignee_scope” which does not exist in the ontology.


Renato Iannella, Monegraph
Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group