Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml?

> On 15 Oct. 2016, at 03:23, Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken <pjohnston@wiley.com> wrote:
> 
> What I would really recommend is refactoring the current JSON so that it is more compatible with JSON-LD, and merging the two – then JSON consumers can just ignore anything with an “@...”, where JSON-LD consumers factor it in.  

Thanks Patrick. I think that's exactly where we want to be.

>  One question on inheritance: it might be worth looking at owl:imports as a means to inherit at an RDF level. I do see that there are some conditions on inheritance that might not make this suitable: https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/model/2-1/#section-211 <https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/model/2-1/#section-211>, but it’s just a thought.

Interesting idea. Will look into it more...

Renato Iannella, Monegraph
Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group