- From: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:02:37 +0200
- To: public-poe-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <8e76d965-cf7e-4a71-7025-99ea1cac8e2b@fi.upm.es>
Dear all,
I am afraid I can not attend today's call --my students are making a test.
/Wouldn’t it be better, especially for the second permission, to
model that “rdf:statement” constraint as part of the Permission, not
the duty?/
/
/
/That is, you are permitted to reproduce 1 triple from target
dataset:ds01 if you pay 0.01EUR/
Yes, certainly. Maybe we can correct it and add it as an example of use
of external vocab (gr)
Víctor
El 19/10/2016 a las 4:52, Renato Iannella escribió:
> Hi Victor, in your slides:
>
> <victor> I can solve mine inmediatly Action 25. the example
> that is requested can be seen in slide 18 of
> [21]http://tutorials.oeg-upm.net/rightslinkeddata/session4b.pdf
>
> Wouldn’t it be better, especially for the second permission, to model
> that “rdf:statement” constraint as part of the Permission, not the duty?
>
> That is, you are permitted to reproduce 1 triple from target
> dataset:ds01 if you pay 0.01EUR
>
> (and hence, each time you do that, you pay 0.01EUR)
>
> Renato Iannella, Monegraph
> Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group
>
--
Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel
D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
ETS de Ingenieros Informáticos
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Campus de Montegancedo s/n
Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain
Tel. (+34) 91336 3753
Skype: vroddon3
Received on Monday, 24 October 2016 11:04:40 UTC