- From: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:02:37 +0200
- To: public-poe-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <8e76d965-cf7e-4a71-7025-99ea1cac8e2b@fi.upm.es>
Dear all, I am afraid I can not attend today's call --my students are making a test. /Wouldn’t it be better, especially for the second permission, to model that “rdf:statement” constraint as part of the Permission, not the duty?/ / / /That is, you are permitted to reproduce 1 triple from target dataset:ds01 if you pay 0.01EUR/ Yes, certainly. Maybe we can correct it and add it as an example of use of external vocab (gr) Víctor El 19/10/2016 a las 4:52, Renato Iannella escribió: > Hi Victor, in your slides: > > <victor> I can solve mine inmediatly Action 25. the example > that is requested can be seen in slide 18 of > [21]http://tutorials.oeg-upm.net/rightslinkeddata/session4b.pdf > > Wouldn’t it be better, especially for the second permission, to model > that “rdf:statement” constraint as part of the Permission, not the duty? > > That is, you are permitted to reproduce 1 triple from target > dataset:ds01 if you pay 0.01EUR > > (and hence, each time you do that, you pay 0.01EUR) > > Renato Iannella, Monegraph > Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group > -- Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial ETS de Ingenieros Informáticos Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Campus de Montegancedo s/n Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain Tel. (+34) 91336 3753 Skype: vroddon3
Received on Monday, 24 October 2016 11:04:40 UTC