Thursday, 28 February 2013
- RE: rdfa11.jsonld (was Re: Open Annotation / Default Context Location?)
- Re: rdfa11.jsonld (was Re: Open Annotation / Default Context Location?)
- RE: rdfa11.jsonld (was Re: Open Annotation / Default Context Location?)
- Re: rdfa11.jsonld (was Re: Open Annotation / Default Context Location?)
- Re: rdfa11.jsonld (was Re: Open Annotation / Default Context Location?)
- RE: rdfa11.jsonld (was Re: Open Annotation / Default Context Location?)
- rdfa11.jsonld (was Re: Open Annotation / Default Context Location?)
- RE: Open Annotation / Default Context Location?
Wednesday, 27 February 2013
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Open Annotation / Default Context Location?
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- JSON-LD Logo Contest started
- RE: JSON-LD Logo Contest
Tuesday, 26 February 2013
Wednesday, 27 February 2013
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
Tuesday, 26 February 2013
- [LOGO] David I. Lehn
- Re: JSON-LD Logo Contest
- RE: Open Annotation / Default Context Location?
- Re: Open Annotation / Default Context Location?
- RE: Open Annotation / Default Context Location?
- JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-02-26
- Re: JSON-LD Logo Contest
- JSON-LD Logo Contest
- Open Annotation / Default Context Location?
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, February 26th 2013
Monday, 25 February 2013
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- RE: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Keyword for embedding nodes
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
Sunday, 24 February 2013
- JSON-LD 1.0 Ready for Last Call
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
- Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization
Wednesday, 20 February 2013
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- RE: Inverse properties in JSON-LD
- Re: Inverse properties in JSON-LD
- Re: Inverse properties in JSON-LD
- RE: Inverse properties in JSON-LD
- Re: Inverse properties in JSON-LD
- RE: Inverse properties in JSON-LD
- Re: Inverse properties in JSON-LD
- RE: Inverse properties in JSON-LD
- RE: Inverse properties in JSON-LD
Tuesday, 19 February 2013
Wednesday, 20 February 2013
Tuesday, 19 February 2013
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-02-19
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
Monday, 18 February 2013
- Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, February 18th 2013
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- RE: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- RE: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- RE: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- RE: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- RE: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- RE: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- RE: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
Sunday, 17 February 2013
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
Saturday, 16 February 2013
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
Friday, 15 February 2013
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
Thursday, 14 February 2013
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Intent to close ISSUE-204
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Issue with context in the playground?
- RE: Issue with context in the playground?
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Issue with context in the playground?
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
Wednesday, 13 February 2013
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Intent to close ISSUE-213
- Problem with auto-generated fragment IDs for graph names
- Re: iCalendar and vCard in JSON(-LD?)
- RE: iCalendar and vCard in JSON(-LD?)
- Re: iCalendar and vCard in JSON(-LD?)
- iCalendar and vCard in JSON(-LD?)
Tuesday, 12 February 2013
- Re: Review of alternate2.html
- JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-02-12
- RE: Review of alternate2.html
- Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, February 12th 2013
Monday, 11 February 2013
Wednesday, 6 February 2013
- RE: The default graph, @id, and @graph
- RE: The default graph, @id, and @graph
- Re: The default graph, @id, and @graph
- Re: Use FOAF or schema.org in examples?
- RE: Use FOAF or schema.org in examples?
- Re: Use FOAF or schema.org in examples?
- Re: Use FOAF or schema.org in examples?
Tuesday, 5 February 2013
- Re: Use FOAF or schema.org in examples?
- Re: Use FOAF or schema.org in examples?
- Re: Use FOAF or schema.org in examples?
- RE: Use FOAF or schema.org in examples?
- Re: Use FOAF or schema.org in examples?
- Re: Use FOAF or schema.org in examples?
- JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-02-05
- Use FOAF or schema.org in examples?
- RE: Another alternate version of the JSON-LD API spec
- RE: The default graph, @id, and @graph
- Re: The default graph, @id, and @graph
- Intent to close ISSUE-214
- Intent to close ISSUE-216
Monday, 4 February 2013
- Re: Another alternate version of the JSON-LD API spec
- Re: Another alternate version of the JSON-LD API spec
- Re: Another alternate version of the JSON-LD API spec
- Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, February 5th 2013
- Another alternate version of the JSON-LD API spec