- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 21:45:18 +0100
- To: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@danbri.org>, "'Gregg Kellogg'" <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: "'Linked JSON'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
> On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 9:32 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > > On 5 Feb 2013 11:03, "Gregg Kellogg" <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 5, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: > > > > > > I noticed that Manu and Dave have been replacing most uses of FOAF in the > > > examples with Schema.org. On one hand, I find that good since probably more > > > people know about schema.org than about FOAF. On the other hand I find it > > > strange to use IRIs which do not resolve to anything useful when being > > > dereferenced; in fact, you'll get a 404. > > > > I think using schema.org makes it more relevant to developers. The fact that > > dereferencing a predicate IRI results in a 404 is a temporary issue, which I > > believe DanBri is addressing. So, in the long run, it shouldn't be an issue. > > Yes, making per-property pages is on my list... Awesome. In that case, I think we should switch to schema.org in all examples to be consistent. If no one objects, I will do that in the next couple of days. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 20:45:52 UTC